PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 2006Palliative Medicine183 citations

Factors predictive of preferred place of death in the general population of South Australia

View Full Paper
LFLinda M ForemanFlinders UniversityRHRoger HuntSA HealthCLColin LukeIndian Council of Medical Research

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

In a population survey, 2652 respondents aged 15+ years reported their preferred place of death, if dying of 'a terminal illness such as cancer or emphysema', to be home (70%), a hospital (19%), hospice (10%), or nursing home (<1%). The majority of respondents in all socio-demographic categories reported a preference for dying at home, with the greatest majorities occurring in younger age groups. After weighting to the age-sex distribution of all South Australian cancer deaths, 58% in our survey declared a preference to die at home, which is much higher than the 14% of cancer deaths that actually occurred at home in South Australia in 2000-2002. Multivariable analyses indicate that predictors of preferred home death include younger age, male, born in the UK/Ireland or Italy/Greece, better physical health, poorer mental health, and fewer concerns about dying at home. Predictors of preference for death in a hospice rather than hospital include older age, female, single, metropolitan residence, having higher educational and income levels, paid employment, awareness of advanced directives, and interpreting 'dying with dignity' as death without pain or suffering. Investigating the differences between preferred and actual places of death may assist service providers to meet end-of-life wishes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Foreman et al. (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7a10ce684c0941cf322dd0https://doi.org/10.1191/0269216306pm1149oa
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Assessment of the SF-36 version 2 in the United Kingdom.1999 · 578 citations
  2. 2Priorities and preferences for end of life care in England, Wales and Scotland2003 · 51 citations
  3. 3Which patients with terminal cancer are admitted from home care?1994 · 180 citations
  4. 4A prospective study of preferred versus actual place of death among patients referred to a palliative care home-care service.2002 · 83 citations
  5. 5Hospice utilization by male and female cancer patients in an end-of-life transition program.2002 · 4 citations