PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 2, 2004Circulation294 citations

Contribution of Stent Underexpansion to Recurrence After Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation for In-Stent Restenosis

View Full Paper
KFKenichi FujiiGMGary S. MintzYKYoshio Kobayashi

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We used intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) to evaluate recurrence after sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR). METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-eight ISR lesions (41 patients with objective evidence of ischemia) were treated with SES. Recurrent ISR was identified in 11 lesions (all focal); repeat revascularization was performed in 10. These were compared with 16 patients (19 lesions) without recurrence as documented by angiography. Nine of 11 recurrent lesions had a minimum stent area (MSA) <5.0 mm2 versus 5 of 19 nonrecurrent lesions (P=0.003); 7 of 11 recurrent lesions had an MSA <4.0 mm2 versus 4 of 19 nonrecurrent lesions (P=0.02); and 4 of 11 recurrent lesions had an MSA <3.0 mm2 versus 1 of 19 nonrecurrent lesions (P=0.03). A gap between SESs was identified in 3 of 11 recurrences versus 1 of 19 nonrecurrent lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Stent underexpansion is a significant cause of failure after SES implantation treatment of ISR.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fujii et al. (2004) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7a18462eb3c7e469f3d92chttps://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000121327.67756.19
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper