PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 28, 1999Clinical Science33 citations

Use of opposing reflex stimuli and heart rate variability to examine the effects of lipophilic and hydrophilic β-blockers on human cardiac vagal control

View Full Paper
JVJulian VaileJFJanine FletcherMAM. Al-Ani

Structured PICO

Do lipophilic and hydrophilic beta-blockers increase cardiac vagal control in healthy volunteers compared to placebo?

P
Population
20 healthy volunteers
I
Intervention
Atenolol or metoprolol for 72 hours
C
Comparator
Placebo
O
Outcome
Heart rate variability (time and frequency domains) and cardiac vagal reflexes (trigeminal stimulation and isometric forearm muscle contraction)surrogate

Both lipophilic and hydrophilic beta-blockers are equally efficacious in increasing cardiac vagal modulation of heart rate in healthy humans.

Abstract

Evidence from animal studies suggests that beta-blockers can act within the central nervous system to increase cardiac vagal motoneuron activity. We have attempted to determine whether such an effect is evident in healthy humans, by examining the effects of lipophilic and hydrophilic agents on heart rate variability and cardiac vagal reflexes. A total of 20 healthy volunteers took part in the study. Autonomic studies were performed after 72 h of treatment with placebo, atenolol or metoprolol in a blinded cross-over design. ECG recordings were taken at rest and during mental and orthostatic stress. Heart rate variability was measured in the time and frequency domains. The effects on heart rate of two opposing cardiac vagal reflexes were examined. Trigeminal stimulation causing vagal stimulation, and isometric forearm muscle contraction ('muscle heart reflex') causing vagal inhibition, were performed alone and simultaneously. At rest, during mental stress and during trigeminal stimulation, beta-blocker therapy was associated with significantly increased high-frequency beat-to-beat heart rate variability when compared with placebo. There were no significant differences in effects on heart rate or heart rate variability between atenolol and metoprolol. Analysis of the muscle heart reflex, alone and with simultaneous trigeminal stimulation, showed that the magnitude of the R-R interval response was significantly greater after beta-blocker therapy compared with placebo, but the effects of atenolol and metoprolol were equivalent. beta-Blocker therapy increased cardiac vagal activity, as shown by measures of high-frequency heart rate variability and reflex studies. Lipophilic and hydrophilic beta-blockers appeared to be equally efficacious in increasing the cardiac vagal modulation of heart rate.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Vaile et al. (1999) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7a2ce58a3ae1c74232a261https://doi.org/10.1042/cs0970585
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper