PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 21, 2018Tobacco Induced Diseases13 citationsOpen Access

Exploring the impact of efficacy messages on cessation-relatedoutcomes using Ecological Momentary Assessment

VLVictoria LambertSFStuart G. FergusonJNJeff Niederdeppe

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Observational studies indicate that cigarette package inserts with efficacy messages about the benefits of quitting (i.e. response efficacy) and recommendations for successful cessation increase smokers' self-efficacy to quit and promote sustained cessation. However, the effects of inserts with such efficacy messages have not been studied using experimental designs. This study used ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to assess smokers' responses to efficacy inserts. METHODS: In a randomized case-crossover study among smokers from the United States (n=23), participants received a one-week supply of cigarettes with efficacy inserts and a one-week supply without any inserts, and were randomized to use the packs with inserts on either the first or second week of the study. For 14 consecutive days, participants used a smartphone to answer brief surveys on cessation-related variables during smoking sessions and at the beginning of each day. Multilevel mixed-effects linear and logistic regression models compared responses during the insert period to those of the non-insert period. RESULTS: The insert period was associated with greater desire to quit (b=0.21, p=0.012), motivation to quit (b=0.18, p=0.001), self-efficacy to cut down (b=0.26, p<0.001) and to quit (b=0.28, p<0.000), and response efficacy/perceived benefits of quitting (b=0.13, p=0.012). Insert exposure was not significantly associated with forgoing cigarettes (OR=1.9, p=0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Results from this EMA study suggest that inserts with efficacy messages may promote determinants of smoking cessation. This is consistent with observational research in Canada, which is the only country to use inserts with efficacy messages as well as pictorial warnings about smoking risks on the outside of packs. Future studies should assess the extent to which efficacy inserts can not only be used to communicate health information to smokers but also work in synergy with pictorial warnings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lambert et al. (2018) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7af57a14b028facf0e9f66https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/94460
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A power primer.1992 · 42,738 citations
  2. 2Ecological Momentary Assessment2007 · 6,442 citations
  3. 3Stage of Change Movement across Three Health Behaviors: The Role of Self-Efficacy2004 · 71 citations
  4. 4A power primer.1992 · 8,789 citations
  5. 5Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model1992 · 3,904 citations