PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 201237 citations

Sizing the aortic annulus.

ACAlfredo Giuseppe CerilloMMM MarianiSBSérgio Berti

Key Result

Calibrated balloon aortic valvuloplasty led to a strategy change in 22.6% of patients with incomplete or dubious non-invasive imaging prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Structured PICO

Do MDCT and calibrated balloon aortic valvuloplasty improve the accuracy of aortic annulus sizing compared to TEE in TAVI candidates?

P
Population
31 patients undergoing evaluation for transcatheter aortic valve implantation with incomplete or dubious non-invasive imaging who received calibrated balloon aortic valvuloplasty.
I
Intervention
Multidetector Computed Tomography (MDCT) and calibrated balloon aortic valvuloplasty for aortic annulus sizing
C
Comparator
Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)
O
Outcome
Accurate preoperative assessment of aortic annular dimensionssurrogate

MDCT and calibrated balloon aortic valvuloplasty offer more accurate 3-dimensional assessment of the aortic annulus than 2-dimensional TEE, potentially reducing catastrophic complications during TAVI.

Limitations

  • Transesophageal echocardiography results are largely operator dependent and can significantly underestimate the annulus.
  • Bi-dimensional imaging is limited in its ability to measure the true annulus diameter.
  • Exact identification of the virtual basal ring plane on MDCT is not always straightforward in clinical practice.

Abstract

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a valuable alternative for aortic valve replacement in selected high-risk candidates. Accurate preoperative assessment of the aortic annular dimensions is crucial for the success of TAVI, since choice of an incorrectly sized prosthesis may result in catastrophic complications. These complications include annular rupture and coronary arterial obstruction, if the prosthesis is too big, or prosthesis migration and severe paravalvular leakage, if the prosthesis is too small. According to current recommendations, the choice of prosthesis size is based on transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) measurements. However, TEE results are dependent on operator experience. Moreover, recent research has shown that TEE can significantly underestimate annular dimensional measurements. Alternative sizing methods based on Multidetector Computed Tomography (MDCT) or manometry during balloon aortic valvuloplasty have therefore been developed. We present a brief overview of the imaging modalities available for preoperative assessment of annular size and discuss their potential advantages and limitations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cerillo et al. (2012) conducted a review in Aortic stenosis (n=31). Calibrated balloon aortic valvuloplasty was evaluated on Strategy change (selection of a different size prosthesis or switch to conventional surgery). Calibrated balloon aortic valvuloplasty led to a strategy change in 22.6% of patients with incomplete or dubious non-invasive imaging prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7affebfbd9051d3b0e88d1https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2225-319x.2012.06.13
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper