PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 9, 2003Journal of Internal Medicine56 citations

Risk of haemorrhagic stroke in patients with oral anticoagulation compared with the general population

View Full Paper
ASAnders SjälanderGEGunnar EngströmEBErik Berntorp

Structured PICO

Does oral anticoagulation increase the risk of haemorrhagic stroke and fatal outcome compared to the general population?

P
Population
4,434 patients treated with oral anticoagulation (6,693 treatment years) and the general population from the Stroke Register of Malmö, Sweden.
I
Intervention
Oral anticoagulation (OA) treatment
C
Comparator
Untreated general population
O
Outcome
Incidence of haemorrhagic stroke (HS) and risk of fatal outcome after HSsafety

Oral anticoagulation is associated with a roughly 10-fold increased risk of haemorrhagic stroke and a 2.6-fold increased risk of fatal outcome following a haemorrhagic stroke compared to the general population.

Abstract

Abstract. Själander A, Engström G, Berntorp E, Svensson P (Malmö University Hospital, University of Lund, Sweden). Risk of haemorrhagic stroke in patients with oral anticoagulation compared with the general population. J Intern Med 2003; 254: 434–438. Objectives. To compare the incidence of haemorrhagic stroke (HS), and the risk of fatal outcome after HS in patients with oral anticoagulation (OA) treatment and in the general population. Design. Five‐year cohort study. Setting. The Anticoagulation Clinic, Malmö University Hospital, Lund, Sweden. Subjects. A total of 4434 patients treated with OA (6693 treatment years) from 1 Oct 1993 to 30 Sept 1998. The population‐based Stroke Register of Malmö, Lund, Sweden (STROMA). Results. Forty‐eight patients had HS according to ICD 9 code 430 and 431. HS occurred at a higher age in women compared with men (mean age 79.5 years vs. 74.7 years, P = 0.009). The age‐adjusted relative risk of HS during OA treatment was 10.9 (CI 6.7–17.6) for men and 9.3 (CI 5.7–15.0) for women, as compared with the untreated general population. Number needed to harm (NNH) (person‐years) was 103 for men and 188 for women. Adjusted for age and sex, OA treatment was significantly associated with fatal outcome in patients with HS (OR = 2.6, CI 1.4–4.8). Conclusions. Patients with OA treatment had approximately 10 times higher risk of HS as compared with the general population, and the risk increased markedly with age. OA treatment is associated with an increased case fatality in patients with HS.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Själander et al. (2003) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7b3728a861e9f59932dcc2https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2796.2003.01209.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper