PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 11, 2026ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam)1,106 citations

Heart rate as a risk factor in chronic heart failure (SHIFT): the association between heart rate and outcomes in a randomised placebo-controlled trial

View Full Paper
MBMichael BöhmKSKarl SwedbergMKMichel Komajda

Key Result

The treatment effect of ivabradine on cardiovascular death or worsening heart failure was neutralized after adjusting for heart-rate reduction at 28 days (HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.85-1.06).

Key Points

  • The aim is to assess the relationship between heart rate and cardiovascular events in chronic heart failure patients.
  • Analysed cardiovascular outcomes in 3264 placebo and 3241 ivabradine patients from the SHIFT trial.
  • Primary composite endpoint assessed was cardiovascular death or hospital admission for worsening heart failure.
  • Adjusted analysis for change in heart rate to evaluate ivabradine's risk-reducing mechanism.
  • Patients with heart rates >87 bpm had a hazard ratio of 2.34 for the composite endpoint compared to those with <72 bpm.
  • Risk increased 3% for each additional beat in baseline heart rate and 16% for every 5 bpm increase.
  • At 28 days, patients with heart rates <60 bpm on ivabradine had an event rate of 17.4%, indicating better outcomes.

Study Design

Type

RCT (n=6,505)

Blinding

placebo-controlled

Randomization

randomised

Structured PICO

Does ivabradine reduce the composite of cardiovascular death or hospital admission for worsening heart failure in patients with chronic heart failure?

P
Population
6,505 patients with chronic heart failure.
I
Intervention
Ivabradine (selective heart-rate-lowering agent)
C
Comparator
Placebo
O
Outcome
Composite of cardiovascular death or hospital admission for worsening heart failurecomposite

Elevated resting heart rate is an independent risk factor for adverse cardiovascular outcomes in chronic heart failure, and lowering heart rate with ivabradine directly correlates with improved outcomes.

Main Result

Hazard Ratio: 0.95 (95% CI 0.85–1.06)

p-value: p=0.352

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Raised resting heart rate is a marker of cardiovascular risk. We postulated that heart rate is also a risk factor for cardiovascular events in heart failure. In the SHIFT trial, patients with chronic heart failure were treated with the selective heart-rate-lowering agent ivabradine. We aimed to test our hypothesis by investigating the association between heart rate and events in this patient population. METHODS: We analysed cardiovascular outcomes in the placebo (n=3264) and ivabradine groups (n=3241) of this randomised trial, divided by quintiles of baseline heart rate in the placebo group. The primary composite endpoint was cardiovascular death or hospital admission for worsening heart failure. In the ivabradine group, heart rate achieved at 28 days was also analysed in relation to subsequent outcomes. Analysis adjusted to change in heart rate was used to study heart-rate reduction as mechanism for risk reduction by ivabradine directly. FINDINGS: In the placebo group, patients with the highest heart rates (>or=87 beats per min bpm, n=682, 286 events) were at more than two-fold higher risk for the primary composite endpoint than were patients with the lowest heart rates (70 to <72 bpm, n=461, 92 events; hazard ratio HR 2.34, 95% CI 1.84-2.98, p<0.0001). Risk of primary composite endpoint events increased by 3% with every beat increase from baseline heart rate and 16% for every 5-bpm increase. In the ivabradine group, there was a direct association between heart rate achieved at 28 days and subsequent cardiac outcomes. Patients with heart rates lower than 60 bpm at 28 days on treatment had fewer primary composite endpoint events during the study (n=1192; event rate 17.4%, 95% CI 15.3-19.6) than did patients with higher heart rates. The effect of ivabradine is accounted for by heart-rate reduction, as shown by the neutralisation of the treatment effect after adjustment for change of heart rate at 28 days (HR 0.95, 0.85-1.06, p=0.352). INTERPRETATION: Our analysis confirms that high heart rate is a risk factor in heart failure. Selective lowering of heart rates with ivabradine improves cardiovascular outcomes. Heart rate is an important target for treatment of heart failure. FUNDING: Servier, France.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Böhm et al. (2010) conducted an RCT in chronic heart failure (n=6,505). ivabradine vs. placebo was evaluated on cardiovascular death or hospital admission for worsening heart failure (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.85-1.06, p=0.352). The treatment effect of ivabradine on cardiovascular death or worsening heart failure was neutralized after adjusting for heart-rate reduction at 28 days (HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.85-1.06).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7b700c4aa654994ddc2d47https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61259-7
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Influence of the force—frequency relationship on haemodynamics and left ventricular function in patients with non-failing hearts and in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy1994 · 234 citations
  2. 2Heart Rate and Cardiac Rhythm Relationships With Bisoprolol Benefit in Chronic Heart Failure in CIBIS II Trial2001 · 528 citations
  3. 3Impact of Heart Rate on Mechanical Dyssynchrony and Left Ventricular Contractility in Patients with Heart Failure and Normal QRS Duration2007 · 30 citations
  4. 4Predictors of mortality and morbidity in patients with chronic heart failure2005 · 977 citations
  5. 5Ivabradine and outcomes in chronic heart failure (SHIFT): a randomised placebo-controlled study2010 · 2,575 citations