PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 1, 2002Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports65 citations

Adaptation of cardiac morphology and function to endurance and strength training

View Full Paper
PWP. WernstedtCSCamilla SjostedtIEInger Ekman

Structured PICO

Does endurance or strength training alter left ventricular dimensions and maximal oxygen uptake compared to untrained controls?

P
Population
57 subjects including endurance-trained athletes (10 male, 10 female), strength-trained athletes (8 male, 10 female), and untrained subjects (9 male, 10 female)
I
Intervention
Endurance training or strength training
C
Comparator
Untrained controls
O
Outcome
Left ventricular (LV) dimensions and function, and maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max)surrogate

Endurance training, but not strength training, is associated with increased left ventricular volumes and mass, which are strongly dependent on oxygen transport capacity.

Abstract

Left ventricular (LV) dimensions and function and maximal oxygen uptake (VO(2)max) were measured in endurance-trained (10 male, m, 10 female, f), strength-trained athletes (8 m, 10 f) and untrained subjects (9 m, 10 f). LV dimensions were measured using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and echocardiography and the results were equal irrespective of method. Endurance-trained m and f had significantly higher LV volumes and mass than both strength-trained and controls. No VO(2)max or dimensional differences were seen between strength-trained and untrained subjects. In endurance-trained males, LV volumes and mass/kg bw were higher than in endurance-trained females. There was no significant gender difference for strength-trained or untrained subjects regarding body weight-related heart dimensions. It is concluded that LV dimensions and volumes are strongly dependent on oxygen transport capacity in normal subjects practising different modes of training, and that the gender differences, if LV dimensions are related to aerobic work capacity, are smaller than previously reported.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wernstedt et al. (2002) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7bf284c06c4f060a75e656https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0838.2002.120104.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper