PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 15, 1993Annals of Internal Medicine87 citations

Diastolic Compliance of Hypertrophied Ventricle Is Not Acutely Altered by Pharmacologic Agents Influencing Active Processes

View Full Paper
DKDavid A. Kass

Structured PICO

Does intravenous esmolol or verapamil alter diastolic compliance in patients with ventricular hypertrophy?

P
Population
14 patients with ventricular hypertrophy (19 +/- 4.5-mm diastolic-wall thickness) and normal resting systolic function undergoing invasive cardiac catheterization
I
Intervention
Intravenous esmolol or verapamil or both
C
Comparator
Baseline (uncontrolled before-after study)
O
Outcome
Change in chamber contractility and diastolic compliance determined by pressure-volume relationssurrogate

Intravenous esmolol and verapamil do not acutely alter left ventricular compliance in hypertrophied ventricles, suggesting compliance is primarily determined by passive structural elements.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test, by studying the acute effects of drugs that influence active processes, the hypothesis that in humans with marked ventricular hypertrophy, reduced chamber compliance is primarily caused by passive structural changes. DESIGN: An uncontrolled (before-after) study. SETTING: University Medical Center. PATIENTS: Fourteen patients with ventricular hypertrophy (19 +/- 4.5-mm diastolic-wall thickness) and normal resting systolic function were studied while they had invasive cardiac catheterization. INTERVENTION: Intravenous beta-blocker (esmolol) or calcium channel blocker (verapamil) or both. MEASUREMENTS: Left ventricular function was determined by pressure-volume relations. Volume was measured using conductance catheter, providing a continuous voltage signal proportional to chamber volume. Pressure was measured by micromanometer. Cardiac-specific assessment of change in chamber contractility and diastolic compliance due to each drug was determined. RESULTS: Both drugs lowered contractility by approximately 30% (P < 0.01). Esmolol slowed relaxation and reduced early peak filling rate, whereas verapamil delayed the time to peak filling (all P < 0.05). In contrast to the effects of both drugs on active contraction and early diastole, late-diastolic compliance was unaltered, and end-diastolic pressure-volume relations were almost identical. CONCLUSION: Neither beta-receptor nor calcium channel blockade acutely alters left ventricular compliance despite substantial active effects manifest in systole and early diastole. This supports the notion that chamber compliance is principally determined by passive structural elements in the heart rather than by active processes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

David A. Kass (1993) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7c979eb7ca9b673b7ccd2bhttps://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-119-6-199309150-00004
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper