PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 11, 2017Journal of the American Heart Association293 citationsOpen Access

Inflammatory Biomarkers Interleukin‐6 and C‐Reactive Protein and Outcomes in Stable Coronary Heart Disease: Experiences From the STABILITY (Stabilization of Atherosclerotic Plaque by Initiation of Darapladib Therapy) Trial

View Full Paper
CHClaes HeldHWHarvey D. WhiteRSRalph Stewart

Structured PICO

Are elevated levels of IL-6 or hs-CRP associated with adverse clinical outcomes in patients with stable coronary heart disease?

P
Population
14,611 patients with stable coronary heart disease from the STABILITY trial
I
Intervention
Higher levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP)
C
Comparator
Lower levels of IL-6 and hs-CRP (quartile analysis)
O
Outcome
Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)composite

IL-6, but not hs-CRP, is independently associated with major adverse cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with stable coronary heart disease, suggesting it may reflect a key pathophysiological process.

Abstract

Background Evaluation of cardiovascular prognosis in patients with stable coronary heart disease is based on clinical characteristics and biomarkers indicating dysglycemia, dyslipidemia, renal dysfunction, and possibly cardiac dysfunction. Inflammation plays a key role in atherosclerosis, but the association between inflammatory biomarkers and clinical outcomes is less studied in this population. Methods and Results Overall, 15 828 patients with coronary heart disease in the STABILITY (Stabilization of Atherosclerotic Plaque by Initiation of Darapladib Therapy) trial were randomized to treatment with darapladib or placebo and observed for a median of 3.7 years. In 14 611 patients, levels of interleukin‐6 ( IL ‐6) and high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein were measured in plasma samples: median levels were 2.1 (interquartile range, 1.4–3.2) ng/L and 1.3 (interquartile range, 0.6–3.1) mg/L, respectively. Associations between continuous levels or quartile groups and adjudicated outcomes were evaluated by spline graphs and Cox regression adjusted for clinical factors and cardiovascular biomarkers. IL ‐6 was associated with increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (quartile 4 versus quartile 1 hazard ratio HR , 1.60; 95% confidence interval CI, 1.30–1.97; P <0.0001); cardiovascular death ( HR , 2.15; 95% CI, 1.53–3.04; P <0.0001); myocardial infarction ( HR , 1.53; 95% CI, 1.14–2.04; P <0.05); all‐cause mortality ( HR , 2.11; 95% CI, 1.62–2.76; P <0.0001); and risk of hospitalization for heart failure ( HR , 2.28; 95% CI, 1.34–3.89; P <0.001). Cancer death was doubled in the highest IL ‐6 quartile group ( HR , 2.34; 95% CI, 1.20–4.53; P <0.05). High‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein was associated with both cardiovascular and non‐cardiovascular events in the unadjusted model, but these did not remain after multivariable adjustments. Conclusions IL ‐6, an upstream inflammatory marker, was independently associated with the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, cardiovascular and all‐cause mortality, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and cancer mortality in patients with stable coronary heart disease. IL‐6 might reflect a pathophysiological process involved in the development of these events. Clinical Trial Registration URL : http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT 00799903.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Held et al. (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7cb4631b0fae09726ee996https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.116.005077
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper