PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 15, 2002Clinical Infectious Diseases87 citationsOpen Access

A Study Evaluating the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Ertapenem versus Ceftriaxone for the Treatment of Community‐Acquired Pneumonia in Adults

View Full Paper
GOGuillermo OrtízJCJose Caballero‐LopezIFIan R. Friedland

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

In a double-blind, multicenter trial, 502 patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia were randomized to receive therapy with either ertapenem or ceftriaxone (for each, 1 g given intravenously once daily). After a minimum of 3 days, therapy could be switched to oral amoxicillin-clavulanate. The median duration of intravenously administered therapy for the 383 clinically evaluable patients was 4 days for both treatment groups; 345 patients (90.1%) had their treatment switched to orally administered therapy. Of the clinically evaluable patients, 168 (92.3%) in the ertapenem group and 183 (91.0%) in the ceftriaxone group had a favorable clinical response. Streptococcus pneumoniae was the most commonly isolated pathogen, and high cure rates were observed both for penicillin-susceptible and -nonsusceptible infections in the ertapenem group (28 87.5% of 32 patients versus 17 100% of 17 patients, respectively). Both treatment regimens were generally well tolerated; the most common drug-related adverse events reported were diarrhea (2.9% versus 2.7%) and nausea (0.8% versus 2.0%) in the ertapenem and ceftriaxone groups, respectively. These results suggest that ertapenem and ceftriaxone therapy have similar efficacy and safety in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ortíz et al. (2002) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7ce4059092f18ef00eb109https://doi.org/10.1086/339543
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper