PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 9, 2011European Journal of Heart Failure9 citationsOpen Access

Impact of Concomitant Heart Failure on Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: Analysis of the Melbourne Interventional Group Registry

View Full Paper
KLK. LuBYBryan P. YanAAAndrew E. Ajani

Structured PICO

Does a history of concomitant heart failure worsen outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?

P
Population
5006 consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between 2004-2006 enrolled in the Melbourne Interventional Group registry, including 189 (3.8%) with a history of heart failure and 4817 (96.2%) without.
I
Intervention
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with a history of heart failure
C
Comparator
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients without a history of heart failure
O
Outcome
In-hospital, 30-day, and 12-month outcomes including overall mortality and heart failure admissionhard clinical

Concomitant heart failure in patients undergoing PCI is associated with significantly higher 12-month mortality and readmission rates, potentially exacerbated by underutilization of guideline-directed medical therapies.

Abstract

AIMS: The presence of heart failure (HF) is an established risk factor for adverse outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and impact of concomitant HF on major outcomes in contemporary PCI practice. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed 5006 consecutive PCIs (2004-2006) enrolled in the Melbourne Interventional Group registry. Baseline characteristics, in-hospital, 30-day, and 12-month outcomes of patients with a history of HF (n = 189, 3.8%) were compared with patients without HF (n = 4817, 96.2%). Patients with a history of HF were older (mean age 72.9 ± 9.8 vs. 64.3 ± 12 years, P 200 μmol/L; 16.5 vs. 3.9%, P < 0.01), multi-vessel disease (79.8 vs. 58.7%, P < 0.01), and presentation with cardiogenic shock (4.8 vs. 2.1%, P = 0.02). At 12 months, patients with HF had higher overall mortality (13.7 vs. 3.5%, P < 0.01) and rates of HF admission (10.4 vs. 2.0%, P < 0.01). Independent predictors of recurrent HF admission included history of HF odds ratio (OR) 2.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2-4.2, P < 0.01 and renal dysfunction (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.4-4.4, P < 0.01). At 12 months, patients with HF had lower rates of statin (73.9 vs. 89.2%, P < 0.01) and beta-blocker use (55.6 vs. 59.0%, P < 0.01). Angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker use was also relatively low in HF patients (79.6%). CONCLUSION: While the overall incidence of HF in patients undergoing PCI is low, underutilization of HF therapies may contribute to an increased likelihood of subsequent re-admission and increased mortality.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lu et al. (2011) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7cfe02c54fa5ab9c3b3f6bhttps://doi.org/10.1093/eurjhf/hfr003
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper