PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 31, 2012PLoS ONE44 citationsOpen Access

Beneficial Effects on Arterial Stiffness and Pulse-Wave Reflection of Combined Enalapril and Candesartan in Chronic Kidney Disease - A Randomized Trial

MFMarie Frimodt‐MøllerAKAnne‐Lise KamperSSSvend Strandgaard

Structured PICO

Does combined enalapril and candesartan improve central blood pressure and pulse-wave velocity compared to monotherapy in patients with chronic kidney disease?

P
Population
67 patients with chronic kidney disease (mean GFR 30, range 13-59 ml/min/1.73 m2)
I
Intervention
Combined enalapril (aiming at 20 mg once daily) and candesartan (aiming at 16 mg once daily) for 8 weeks
C
Comparator
Monotherapy with either enalapril or candesartan for 16 weeks
O
Outcome
Central blood pressure and aortic pulse-wave velocity (PWV)surrogate

Combined ACE inhibitor and ARB therapy provides additive, blood pressure-independent reductions in arterial stiffness and pulse-wave reflection compared to monotherapy in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is highly prevalent in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Inhibition of the renin-angiotensinsystem (RAS) in hypertension causes differential effects on central and brachial blood pressure (BP), which has been translated into improved outcome. The objective was to examine if a more complete inhibition of RAS by combining an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) and an angiotensin receptor antagonist (ARB) compared to monotherapy has an additive effect on central BP and pulse-wave velocity (PWV), which are known markers of CVD. METHODS: Sixty-seven CKD patients (mean GFR 30, range 13-59 ml/min/1.73 m(2)) participated in an open randomized study of 16 weeks of monotherapy with either enalapril or candesartan followed by 8 weeks of dual blockade aiming at a total dose of 16 mg candesartan and 20 mg enalapril o.d. Pulse-wave measurements were performed at week 0, 8, 16 and 24 by the SphygmoCor device. RESULTS: Significant additive BP independent reductions were found after dual blockade in aortic PWV (-0.3 m/s, P<0.05) and in augmentation index (-2%, P<0.01) compared to monotherapy. Furthermore pulse pressure amplification was improved (P<0.05) and central systolic BP reduced (-6 mmHg, P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Dual blockade of the RAS resulted in an additive BP independent reduction in pulse-wave reflection and arterial stiffness compared to monotherapy in CKD patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial.gov NCT00235287.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Frimodt‐Møller et al. (2012) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7d5396ff1a536db837d8dfhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041757
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper