PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 13, 2026Corporate Governance0 citations

Governance disclosure regimes and investor confidence: evaluating comply-or-explain mechanisms in African capital markets

View Full Paper
SBSuleman Bawa

Key Points

  • This study aims to assess how governance disclosure regimes influence investor confidence in African capital markets.
  • Employs multi-method research design with event studies, panel regressions, and difference-in-differences models.
  • Analyzes 6,520 firm-year observations from 2015 to 2024 on governance disclosures and financial performance.
  • Utilizes content analysis to distinguish between substantive and boilerplate governance disclosures.
  • High-quality governance disclosures significantly enhance firm valuation (Tobin's Q) and reduce liquidity costs (bid-ask spreads) in strong regulatory markets like South Africa.
  • Governance disclosures are more linked to market expansion and innovation rather than mere compliance.
  • Investor reactions vary with market maturity and governance credibility, emphasizing the role of foreign institutional ownership.

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to investigate how governance disclosure regimes, particularly comply-or-explain mechanisms, affect investor confidence across African capital markets. Focusing on South Africa, Nigeria and Egypt, it examines whether high-quality governance disclosures enhance firm valuation, improve liquidity and constrain opportunistic behaviors like tunneling, while accounting for institutional differences in enforcement and investor sophistication. Design/methodology/approach The study employs a multi-method research design combining event study methodology, panel regressions, difference-in-differences models and instrumental variable (two-stage least squares) approaches. The dataset includes 6,520 firm-year observations between 2015 and 2024, covering governance disclosures, financial performance, foreign ownership and market data. Governance disclosures are manually coded as substantive or boilerplate based on content analysis. Robustness checks, entropy balancing and heterogeneity analyses by sector, ownership structure and jurisdiction are incorporated to strengthen causal inference. Findings High-quality governance disclosures significantly enhance firm valuation (Tobin’s Q) and reduce liquidity costs (bid-ask spreads), particularly in markets with strong regulatory enforcement, such as South Africa. Firms use governance disclosures strategically, linking them to market expansion, cost reduction and innovation rather than compliance or Environmental, Social, and Governance goals. Foreign institutional ownership strengthens the monitoring effect, while investor reactions vary depending on market maturity and governance credibility. Originality/value This study refines governance and agency theories by empirically illustrating that the effectiveness of disclosure-based regimes in emerging markets depends heavily on institutional quality, investor activism and enforcement strength. It offers insights into the strategic framing of governance disclosures in African firms. It highlights the contextual boundaries of comply-or-explain models, providing actionable guidance for policymakers and scholars focusing on emerging economies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Suleman Bawa (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7d76502b0e0cff3f63f884https://doi.org/10.1108/cg-09-2025-0671
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper