PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2010Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound17 citationsOpen Access

Usefulness of Mitral Annulus Velocity for the Early Detection of Left Ventricular Dysfunction in a Rat Model of Diabetic Cardiomyopathy

DKDae‐Hee KimYKYong Jin KimHKHyung‐Kwan Kim

Key Result

Ten weeks after diabetes induction in a rat model, tissue Doppler imaging showed significantly impaired peak systolic mitral annulus velocity (2.4 vs. 3.1 cm/s) compared to normal controls.

Structured PICO

Does tissue Doppler imaging of the mitral annulus detect early left ventricular dysfunction in a rat model of diabetic cardiomyopathy?

P
Population
25 eight-week-old male Sprague-Dawley rats (15 with streptozocin-induced diabetes and 10 normal controls) followed for 10 weeks.
I
Intervention
Tissue Doppler imaging of mitral annulus
C
Comparator
Invasive hemodynamic measurement using miniaturized conductance catheter (reference standard) / Normal control rats
O
Outcome
Ventricular dysfunction parameters including s', e' velocity, E/e' ratio, slope of the end-systolic pressure volume relation, and preload recruitable stroke work at 10 weekssurrogate

Tissue Doppler imaging of the mitral annulus is a useful non-invasive modality for the early detection of myocardial dysfunction in diabetic cardiomyopathy before ejection fraction declines.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 2.4% vs 3.1%

p-value: p=<0.001

Limitations

  • Survival of the animals after invasive hemodynamic measurement is practically impossible, preventing serial follow-up of hemodynamic variables.
  • Invasive hemodynamic measurement requires surgical technique and considerable time for variable analysis.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diabetic cardiomyopathy (DMCMP) is characterized by myocardial dysfunction regardless of coronary artery disease in diabetic patients. The features of LV dysfunction in rat model of type 1 DM induced by streptozocin, are variable and controversial. Thus, we tested the usefulness of tissue Doppler imaging in the early detection of ventricular dysfunction in a rat model of DMCMP. METHODS: Diabetes was induced by intra-peritoneal injection of streptozocin (70 mg/kg) in 8 weeks of Sprague-Dawley rat. Diagnosis of diabetes was defined as venous glucose level over 350 mg/dL 48 hrs after streptozocin injection. Echocardiography was done at baseline and 10 weeks after diabetes induction both in diabetes group (n=15) and normal control (n=10). After echocardiography at 10 weeks, invasive hemodynamic measurement using miniaturized conductance catheter was done in both groups. RESULTS: Ten weeks after diabetes induction, heart and lung mass indexes of diabetes were larger than those of normal control (3.2+/-0.3 vs. 2.4+/-0.2 mg/g, p<0.001, 5.5+/-1.1 vs. 3.6+/-0.6 mg/g, p<0.001, respectively). In echocardiographic data, s' (2.4+/-0.4 vs. 3.1+/-0.5 cm/s, p<0.001), e' velocity of mitral annulus (2.9+/-0.6 vs. 3.8+/-1.1 cm/s, p<0.001), and E/e' ratio (27.1+/-5.6 vs. 19.7+/-2.6, p<0.001) were impaired in diabetes group. In hemodynamic measurement, there were no differences in ejection fraction, peak dP/dt between the diabetic group and normal control. However, load independent indexes of contractility, the slope of the end-systolic pressure volume relation (0.18+/-0.07 vs. 0.62+/-0.18 mmHg/microL, p<0.001) and preload recruitable stroke work (51.8+/-22.0 vs. 90.9+/-22.5 mmHg, p<0.001) were impaired in diabetic group compared to normal control. CONCLUSION: In a rat model of diabetic cardiomyopathy, tissue Doppler imaging of mitral annulus can be a good modality for early detection of myocardial dysfunction.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kim et al. (2010) studied Diabetic cardiomyopathy (n=25). Streptozocin-induced diabetes vs. Normal control (sodium citrate buffer) was evaluated on Peak systolic mitral annulus velocity (s') (p=<0.001). Ten weeks after diabetes induction in a rat model, tissue Doppler imaging showed significantly impaired peak systolic mitral annulus velocity (2.4 vs. 3.1 cm/s) compared to normal controls.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7db919e5d85d18548c9907https://doi.org/10.4250/jcu.2010.18.1.6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper