PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 22, 2020American Heart Journal63 citationsOpen Access

Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and stage IV-V chronic kidney disease

View Full Paper
VAVeronica AshtonKMKenneth Todd MooreSSShubham Shrivastava

Key Result

Rivaroxaban was associated with a similar risk of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism compared to warfarin in patients with NVAF and advanced CKD (HR 0.93; 95% CI 0.46-1.90; P=.85).

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=2,317)

Structured PICO

Does rivaroxaban reduce ischemic stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding compared to warfarin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and stage IV-V chronic kidney disease?

P
Population
2,317 patients (mean age 80 years, 60.5% female) with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and stage IV-V chronic kidney disease, followed for up to 2 years.
E
Exposure
Rivaroxaban
C
Comparator
Warfarin
O
Outcome
Ischemic stroke/systemic embolism (ISSE) and major bleeding over 2 years following treatment initiationhard clinical

Rivaroxaban appears to be a reasonable alternative to warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and stage IV-V chronic kidney disease, with similar efficacy and safety profiles.

Main Result

Hazard Ratio: 0.93 (95% CI 0.46–1.9)

p-value: p=.85

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is limited evidence on the effectiveness and safety of direct-acting oral anticoagulants in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). This study compared the risks of ischemic stroke/systemic embolism (ISSE) and major bleeding in patients with NVAF and stage IV-V CKD treated with rivaroxaban or warfarin. METHODS: Patients with NVAF and stage IV-V CKD who initiated rivaroxaban or warfarin treatment between November 2011 and June 2018 were selected from the Optum® Deidentified Electronic Health Record Database. Propensity score matching was used to balance rivaroxaban and warfarin patients on 112 measured baseline covariates. ISSE and major bleeding events over 2 years following treatment initiation were ascertained with validated end point definitions. Outcomes were analyzed as time-to-event data using Kaplan-Meier survival estimators and Cox regression. RESULTS: A total of 781 eligible rivaroxaban-treated patients were propensity score-matched to 1,536 warfarin-treated patients; baseline covariates were well balanced after matching (absolute standardized differences <0.1). The average patient age was 80 years; 60.5% were female; 81.3% and 18.7% had CKD stage IV and V, respectively. Hazard ratios for rivaroxaban compared to warfarin were 0.93 (95% CI 0.46-1.90, P = .85) for the risk of ISSE and 0.91 (95% CI 0.65-1.28, P = .60) for major bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: No statistically significant difference in the risk of ISSE or major bleeding was found between rivaroxaban- and warfarin-treated patients. Although further study is needed, rivaroxaban appears to be a reasonable alternative to warfarin for ISSE prevention in the setting of NVAF and stage IV-V CKD.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ashton et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and stage IV-V chronic kidney disease (n=2,317). Rivaroxaban vs. Warfarin was evaluated on Ischemic stroke/systemic embolism (ISSE) (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.46-1.90, p=.85). Rivaroxaban was associated with a similar risk of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism compared to warfarin in patients with NVAF and advanced CKD (HR 0.93; 95% CI 0.46-1.90; P=.85).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7dbb1087be3f923b5ca06fhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2020.01.010
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper