PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2025Annals of Intensive Care8 citationsOpen Access

Decoding portal vein pulsatility: hemodynamic determinants in a post-hoc analysis of a prospective observational trial

CBCosmin BălanBMBianca MoroşanuAFAntonia Fodoroiu

Structured PICO

What are the hemodynamic determinants of portal vein pulsatility index (PVPI) in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery?

P
Population
55 mechanically ventilated patients with circulatory failure within 6 h of ICU admission following elective open-heart surgery (median age 63, 70.9% male). Fluid-tolerant at baseline (PVPI < 50%).
I
Intervention
Passive leg raising (PLR) test followed by 7 mL/kg of Ringer's lactate in fluid-responsive patients, with echocardiographic and hemodynamic assessments at multiple timepoints.
O
Outcome
Hemodynamic determinants of portal vein pulsatility index (PVPI) using echocardiography and mean systemic filling pressure analogue (Pmsa).surrogate

Right ventricular function and mean systemic filling pressure analogue (Pmsa) are independent determinants of portal vein pulsatility index (PVPI), suggesting their combined assessment can guide individualized congestion management.

Limitations

  • Post-hoc analysis with stepwise evaluation of data
  • RV function parameters measured only at T1, T4, and T5
  • Intra-observer reproducibility confirmed only for PVPI and LVOT VTI
  • Single-center pilot study with small sample size

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The portal vein pulsatility index (PVPI) reflects systemic congestion and is influenced by both volume status and right ventricular (RV) function. The mean systemic filling pressure analogue (Pmsa), derived from a mathematical model, estimates the interaction between stressed blood volume and systemic vascular compliance, serving as surrogate marker of volume status. This post-hoc analysis of an observational trial investigates the combined role of Pmsa and RV function as determinants of PVPI using echocardiography. Fifty-five mechanically ventilated patients with circulatory failure were included within 6 h of ICU admission following elective open-heart surgery. Fluid-tolerant patients (PVPI < 50%) underwent a passive leg raising (PLR) test; fluid-responsive patients subsequently received 7 mL/kg of Ringer's lactate. PVPI and Pmsa were measured at five timepoints: baseline (T1), after PLR (T2), upon returning to baseline (T3), after fluid administration (T4), and 20 min post-infusion (T5). RV function parameters, including RV to LV end-diastolic area ratio (RVEDA/LVEDA), tricuspid lateral annular systolic velocity (RV S'), RV fractional area change (RVFAC), pulmonary acceleration time (PAT), and right myocardial performance index (RIMP)-were assessed at T1, T4, and T5. Only fluid-responsive patients were evaluated beyond T3. RESULTS: At T1, robust multilinear regression including all patients identified RVEDA/LVEDA (β = 10.38; p < 0.001), RIMP (β = - 6.54; p = 0.002), and RV S' (β = - 0.60; p = 0.002) as significant determinants of squared PVPI. In all patients, repeated measures correlation between Pmsa and PVPI was strong across T1-to-T3 (ρ = 0.785; p < 0.001), increasing from a non-significant correlation at T1 (ρ = 0.215; p = 0.115). Generalized estimating equations conducted only in fluid-responsive patients across T1, T4, and T5 identified Pmsa (β = 4.19; p < 0.001), RV S' (β = - 5.84; p < 0.001), RVEDA/LVEDA (β = 34.85; p = 0.018), and RIMP (β = - 35.28; p = 0.039) as significant determinants of PVPI. CONCLUSION: RV function and Pmsa are key determinants of PVPI. Their combined assessment may support an individualized congestion management by guiding interventions toward volume status, RV function, or both. Trial registration Primary Trial Registration: NCT06440772. Registered 30 May 2024. Retrospectively registered.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bălan et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7df17b050e98c0187d8778https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-025-01498-0
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper