PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 1993Nippon Eiseigaku Zasshi (Japanese Journal of Hygiene)0 citationsOpen Access

The Relationship between the Ambulatory Variability and the Laboratory Reactivity of Blood Pressure and Heart Rate.

FKFumio KobayashiHFHikari FuruiTWTakemasa Watanabe

Structured PICO

Does ambulatory blood pressure and heart rate variability predict cardiovascular reactivity to laboratory stress tests in healthy young men?

P
Population
21 male college students, normotensive with no cardiovascular disease, mean age 21.8 years.
I
Intervention
Laboratory stress loading tests (mental arithmetic, reaction time task, cold face test, submaximal bicycle exercise test) and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.
C
Comparator
Comparison between high and low ambulatory variability groups (divided by median split of variability 1 [waking vs sleep] and variability 2 [SD during waking] for SBP, DBP, and HR).
O
Outcome
Laboratory reactivity (pretask-to-task increase) of SBP, DBP, HR, stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), and plasma catecholamines.surrogate

Ambulatory blood pressure and heart rate variability in healthy young men correlates with specific cardiovascular and autonomic responses to laboratory stress tests.

Limitations

  • All subjects were young
  • Confounding factors (physical activity, caffeine intake, cigarette smoking) that may have influenced variability in the ambulatory state were not controlled

Abstract

We examined the relationship between the ambulatory variability and the laboratory reactivity of systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and heart rate (HR) in 21 male college students. The mean increase during the waking period from that during sleep was defined as variability 1, and the standard deviation of the ambulatory measurements during waking was defined as variability 2. The reactivity to laboratory tests was measured by the pretask-to-task increase in variables. The high SBP variability 1 group showed a significantly higher reactivity of SBP and noradrenaline in the bicycle exercise test (70w). This suggests the possibility that SBP variability 1, can be predicted by increased reactivity to a mild limb exercise test. The high HR variability 1 group, and the high SBP variability 2 group showed significantly lower reactivity of stroke volume (SV) and cardiac output (CO) in the cold face test. Thus, parasympathetic responses such as trigeminal-brainstem-vagal pathway function or baroreflex sensitivity seemed to be reduced in these groups. The high DBP variability 2 group showed significantly lower DBP reactivity in the cold face test, and low noradrenaline reactivity in the mental arithmetic test, which indicated a reduced alpha-adrenergic response in this group. No other significant differences in reactivity to the laboratory mental stress tests were found between the variability 1 and variability 2 groups.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kobayashi et al. (1993) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7df618fcc540eda03c9646https://doi.org/10.1265/jjh.48.879
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper