PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 1, 2006Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy41 citationsOpen Access

Effectiveness of a Two‐Part Educational Intervention to Improve Hypertension Control: A Cluster‐Randomized Trial

View Full Paper
SHSean HennessyCLCharles E. LeonardWYWei Yang

Structured PICO

Does a multifaceted educational intervention improve blood pressure control in patients with hypertension?

P
Population
10,696 patients with a diagnosis of hypertension cared for by 93 primary care providers in an academic health system.
I
Intervention
Multifaceted educational intervention including academic detailing, provision of provider-specific data about hypertension control, and educational/motivational materials for providers and patients.
C
Comparator
Concurrent control group (standard care).
O
Outcome
Blood pressure control (blood pressure measurement below 140/90 mm Hg) ascertained from electronic medical records over 6 months of follow-up.surrogate

A multifaceted educational intervention targeting both primary care providers and patients did not significantly improve ambulatory blood pressure control over 6 months.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To measure the effectiveness of a multifaceted educational intervention to improve ambulatory hypertension control. DESIGN: Cluster-randomized trial. SETTING: Academic health system using an ambulatory electronic medical record. SUBJECTS: A total of 10,696 patients with a diagnosis of hypertension cared for by 93 primary care providers. INTERVENTION: Academic detailing, provision of provider-specific data about hypertension control, provision of educational materials to the provider, and provision of educational and motivational materials to patients. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was blood pressure control, defined as a blood pressure measurement below 140/90 mm Hg, and was ascertained from electronic medical records over 6 months of follow-up. We determined the adjusted odds ratio for the association between the intervention and the achievement of controlled blood pressure. When we accounted for clustering by provider, this adjusted odds ratio was 1.13 (95% confidence interval 0.87-1.47). Adjusted odds ratios were 1.03 (95% confidence interval 0.78-1.36) in patients whose blood pressure was controlled at baseline and 1.25 (95% confidence interval 0.94-1.65) in those whose blood pressure was not. These odds ratios were not significantly different (p=0.11). CONCLUSIONS: These results were consistent with no effect or, at best, a relatively modest effect of the intervention among patients with hypertension. Had we not included a concurrent control group, the data would have provided an unduly optimistic view of the effectiveness of the program. The effectiveness of future interventions may be improved by focusing on patients whose blood pressure is uncontrolled at baseline.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hennessy et al. (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7e111956ffc194e7d94cbdhttps://doi.org/10.1592/phco.26.9.1342
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Interpractice audit of diagnosis and management of hypertension in primary care: educational intervention and review of medical records1997 · 66 citations
  2. 2Physician-Related Barriers to the Effective Management of Uncontrolled Hypertension2002 · 486 citations
  3. 3The sixth report of the Joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure1997 · 5,671 citations
  4. 4Importance of Systolic Blood Pressure in Older Americans2000 · 406 citations
  5. 5The Urgent Need to Improve Hypertension Care2000 · 75 citations