PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 12, 2021International journal of cardiac imaging9 citationsOpen Access

Added value of cardiovascular calcifications for prediction of recurrent cardiovascular events and cardiovascular interventions in patients with established cardiovascular disease

CKCilie C. van ’t KloosterYGYolanda van der GraafHNHendrik M. Nathoe

Structured PICO

Does the addition of cardiovascular calcification scores to traditional risk factors improve the prediction of recurrent MACE+ in patients with established CVD?

P
Population
567 patients with established cardiovascular disease (CVD) enrolled in a substudy of the UCC-SMART cohort
I
Intervention
Risk prediction models incorporating traditional CVD risk predictors plus coronary artery calcium (CAC), thoracic aortic calcium (TAC), and/or heart valve calcium scores derived from cardiovascular CT imaging
C
Comparator
Risk prediction model with traditional CVD risk predictors only
O
Outcome
Combined endpoint of recurrent major cardiovascular events and cardiovascular interventions (MACE +) at 4 yearscomposite

In patients with established CVD, adding coronary artery calcium scores to traditional risk factors improves the prediction of recurrent cardiovascular events and interventions.

Abstract

The purpose is to investigate the added prognostic value of coronary artery calcium (CAC), thoracic aortic calcium (TAC), and heart valve calcium scores for prediction of a combined endpoint of recurrent major cardiovascular events and cardiovascular interventions (MACE +) in patients with established cardiovascular disease (CVD). In total, 567 patients with established CVD enrolled in a substudy of the UCC-SMART cohort, entailing cardiovascular CT imaging and calcium scoring, were studied. Five Cox proportional hazards models for prediction of 4-year risk of MACE + were developed; traditional CVD risk predictors only (model I), with addition of CAC (model II), TAC (model III), heart valve calcium (model IV), and all calcium scores (model V). Bootstrapping was performed to account for optimism. During a median follow-up of 3.43 years (IQR 2.28-4.74) 77 events occurred (MACE+). Calibration of predicted versus observed 4-year risk for model I without calcium scores was good, and the c-statistic was 0.65 (95%CI 0.59-0.72). Calibration for models II-V was similar to model I, and c-statistics were 0.67, 0.65, 0.65, and 0.68 for model II, III, IV, and V, respectively. NRIs showed improvement in risk classification by model II (NRI 15.24% (95%CI 0.59-29.39)) and model V (NRI 20.00% (95%CI 5.59-34.92)), but no improvement for models III and IV. In patients with established CVD, addition of the CAC score improved performance of a risk prediction model with classical risk factors for the prediction of the combined endpoint MACE+ . Addition of the TAC or heart valve score did not improve risk predictions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Klooster et al. (2021) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7e9e31cb17bc2d1d0d22ddhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-021-02164-9
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper