PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 1986The Journal of Physiology16 citationsOpen Access

Effects of membrane potential on intracellular calcium concentration in sheep Purkinje fibres in sodium‐free solutions.

View Full Paper
MCMark B. CannellDEDavid EisnerWLW. Jonathan Lederer

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The intracellular Ca2+ concentration ( Ca2+i) was measured in voltage-clamped sheep cardiac Purkinje fibers while recording tension simultaneously. 2. When Na+i was elevated (by Na+-K+ pump inhibition) depolarization produced an increase of tonic tension. 3. Replacement of external Na+ by Li+ or choline produced a contracture which then relaxed spontaneously. Following this relaxation, depolarization either had no effect on tonic tension or produced a small decrease. 4. When external Na+ was replaced by Ca2+, depolarization (over the range -120 to -20 mV) produced a decrease of tonic tension and Ca2+i. Hyperpolarization increased tonic tension and Ca2+i. 5. An after-contraction and accompanying increase of Ca2+i were produced by repolarization in both Na+-free and Na+-containing solution. This eliminates the possibility that the stimulus for the after-contraction is the increase of Ca2+i during the depolarization and suggests that the stimulus may be the change of membrane potential. 6. The increase of Ca2+i on hyperpolarization seen in Na+-free solutions persisted in the presence of ryanodine. 7. These results show, in contrast to previous work, that in Na+-free solutions tonic tension is still sensitive to membrane potential. The results support the hypothesis that, in Na+-containing solutions, the increase of tonic tension on depolarization results from a voltage-dependent Na+-Ca2+ exchange. The reduction of tonic tension on depolarization in Na+-free solutions may be due to the decrease of the electrochemical gradient for Ca2+ to enter the cell.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cannell et al. (1986) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7ea11c061146f178a6c402https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1986.sp016322
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper