PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 15, 2006Clinical Cancer Research85 citationsOpen Access

Aberrant Promoter Methylation Profile and Association with Survival in Patients with Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

JGJian GuDBDavid M. BermanCLCharles Lu

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of hypermethylation of tumor suppressor genes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We examined the methylation status of nine genes in 155 tumors from patients with NSCLC using quantitative methylation-specific PCR. We analyzed the associations between gene methylation status and overall patient survival. RESULTS: The methylation index, defined as the ratio between the number of methylated genes and the number of genes tested, was significantly higher in adenocarcinomas (0.38 +/- 0.20) than in squamous cell carcinomas (0.30 +/- 0.22; P = 0.027), in tumors from older patients (0.37 +/- 0.20) than younger patients (0.30 +/- 0.22; P = 0.040), and in tumors from heavier smokers (0.39 +/- 0.21) than lighter smokers (0.29 +/- 0.20; P = 0.042). In the Cox proportional hazards model, p16 methylation was associated with significantly poorer survival hazard ratio, 1.95; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.21-3.39. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that patients with hypermethylated p16 had significantly shorter survival (median = 21.7 months) than patients without p16 hypermethylation (median = 62.5 months; P = 0.0001, log-rank test). Hypermethylation of CDH1 or TIMP3 gene was associated with significantly better survival with hazard ratios of 0.51 (95% CI, 0.29-0.90) and 0.59 (95% CI, 0.36-0.97), respectively. Joint analysis of these three genes showed a significant trend for poorer survival as the number of unfavorable events increased (P = 0.0007). CONCLUSION: Hypermethylation of multiple genes exhibited significant differential effect on NSCLC patient survival. Assessment of the effect of each methylated gene on survival is needed to provide optimal prognostic value.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gu et al. (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7eae35f9627588bb798283https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-06-0894
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Multiplicity of abnormal promoter methylation in lung adenocarcinomas from smokers and never smokers2004 · 82 citations
  2. 2Methylation Profiling of Archived Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Promising Prognostic System2005 · 125 citations
  3. 3Long-term cancer patient survival in the United States.1998 · 166 citations
  4. 4Dose effect of smoking on aberrant methylation in non‐small cell lung cancers2004 · 71 citations
  5. 5RASSF1A is not appropriate as an early detection marker or a prognostic marker for non‐small cell lung cancer2005 · 20 citations