PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2002Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis81 citations

Laboratory Diagnosis of Congenital von Willebrand Disease

UBUlrich BuddeEDE. DrewkeKMKerstin Mainusch

Structured PICO

P
Population
303 patients with congenital von Willebrand disease (vWD)
O
Outcome
Classification of von Willebrand disease subtypes

Congenital von Willebrand disease exhibits significant heterogeneity, particularly within type 2, requiring a complex, stepwise laboratory diagnostic approach for accurate classification.

Abstract

Von Willebrand disease (vWD) is caused by quantitative or qualitative defects, or both, of the von Willebrand factor (vWF), a multimeric high-molecular glycoprotein (GP). Typically, it affects the primary hemostatic system, which is reflected by a mucocutaneous bleeding tendency simulating a platelet function defect. The vWF promotes its function in two ways: (1) by supporting platelet adhesion to the injured vessel wall under conditions of high shear forces and (2) by its carrier function for factor VIIIc (FVIIIc) in plasma. Because of the complexity of the disease, diagnosis of vWD is one of the most challenging of any coagulation disorder. The stepwise diagnosis of vWD includes patients and family history, screening procedures (bleeding time BT, filter tests, platelet counts, activated partial thromboplastin time aPTT), confirmatory tests (vWF antigen vWF:Ag, vWF ristocetin cofactor activity vWF:RCo, vWF collagen-binding vWF:CB assay, ristocetin-induced platelet aggregation RIPA, FVIIIc) and tests for final classification (multimeric analysis, FVIII binding capacity of vWF vWF:FVIIIB, platelet vWF). In 1999, we classified 303 patients with congenital vWD as type 1 (n = 122), type 2 (n = 171), and type 3 (n = 10). Type 2 was further subdivided into type 2A (n = 126), type 2B (n = 17), type 2M (n = 22), and type 2N (n = 6). Type 2A showed a remarkable heterogeneity, with only 27.8% (n = 36) of the "classic" IIA pattern. The other high-frequency patterns were type IB (25.4% n = 32) and type IIE/F/H-like structural abnormalities (28.6% n = 36). The spectrum was completed with samples from patients with types 2D, 2C, 2C Miami, smeary structures, and other rare subtypes (together 18.9% n = 23).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Budde et al. (2002) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7ee70ee7861671be8ed00bhttps://doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-27820
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Laboratory Diagnosis of von Willebrand's Disease2009
  2. 2FAKTOR PATOGENESIS DAN DIAGNOSIS PENYAKIT von Willebrand2018
  3. 3Diagnosis and Management of v on Willebrand Disease in Australia2011 · 15 citations
  4. 4Obstacles to Early Diagnosis and Treatment of Inherited von Willebrand Disease: Current Perspectives2021 · 11 citations
  5. 5Clinical diagnosis of von Willebrand disease2004 · 130 citations