PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 1, 1999Current Opinion in Rheumatology32 citations

How well have diagnostic tests and therapies for gout been evaluated?

View Full Paper
NSNaomi SchlesingerDBDaniel G. BakerHSH. Ralph Schumacher

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The first descriptions of gout can be traced to the dawn of recorded medical history, yet a number of controversies and unanswered questions remain regarding diagnosis and treatment of gout. Questions can still be posed about the need for crystal identification of all cases, the utility of a 24-hour urine collection for uric acid, and even the difficulty of choosing a technique for measurement of uric acid. Some time has elapsed since Mesner stated in 1623, "Love and gout are incurable." How far have we come? How have we evaluated different treatments for gout? Ongoing reviews of the Cochrane collaboration show that there is still very little reliable information based on randomized controlled trials on which to base treatment decisions in acute and chronic gout.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Schlesinger et al. (1999) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7eefbce9bb045a73c3014bhttps://doi.org/10.1097/00002281-199909000-00020
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper