PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2015Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia153 citationsOpen Access

Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio are Predictors of Heart Failure

EDErdal DurmuşTKTarık KıvrakFGFethullah Gerin

Key Result

Higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio was significantly associated with heart failure and served as an independent predictor of mortality during follow-up (OR 1.680).

Study Design

Type

Case-Control (n=96)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Do Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) predict the presence of heart failure and subsequent mortality in HF patients?

P
Population
96 participants, including 56 patients with decompensated heart failure and 40 age- and sex-matched controls, evaluated to determine the prognostic value of inflammatory markers over an average 12.8-month follow-up.
E
Exposure
Measurement of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR)
C
Comparator
Age-sex matched controls without HF (for diagnostic comparison); lower NLR/PLR values (for prognostic comparison)
O
Outcome
Presence of heart failure (diagnostic) and mortality during follow-up (prognostic)hard clinical

NLR and PLR are significantly elevated in patients with decompensated heart failure compared to healthy controls, and NLR serves as an independent predictor of mortality during follow-up.

Main Result

Odds Ratio: 1.68 (95% CI 1.013–2.786)

p-value: p=0.045

Limitations

  • Small sample size
  • Observational and nonrandomized study design
  • Lack of measurement of other inflammatory markers such as TNF-α, IL-6, and CRP
  • Did not measure other inflammatory markers such as TNF-α, IL-6, and CRP

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are inflammatory markers used as prognostic factors in various diseases. The aims of this study were to compare the PLR and the NLR of heart failure (HF) patients with those of age-sex matched controls, to evaluate the predictive value of those markers in detecting HF, and to demonstrate the effect of NLR and PLR on mortality in HF patients during follow-up. METHODS: This study included 56 HF patients and 40 controls without HF. All subjects underwent transthoracic echocardiography to evaluate cardiac functions. The NLR and the PLR were calculated as the ratio of neutrophil count to lymphocyte count and as the ratio of platelet count to lymphocyte count, respectively. All HF patients were followed after their discharge from the hospital to evaluate mortality, cerebrovascular events, and re-hospitalization. RESULTS: The NLR and the PLR of HF patients were significantly higher compared to those of the controls (p < 0.01). There was an inverse correlation between the NLR and the left ventricular ejection fraction of the study population (r: -0.409, p < 0.001). The best cut-off value of NLR to predict HF was 3.0, with 86.3% sensitivity and 77.5% specificity, and the best cut-off value of PLR to predict HF was 137.3, with 70% sensitivity and 60% specificity. Only NLR was an independent predictor of mortality in HF patients. A cut-off value of 5.1 for NLR can predict death in HF patients with 75% sensitivity and 62% specificity during a 12.8-month follow-up period on average. CONCLUSION: NLR and PLR were higher in HF patients than in age-sex matched controls. However, NLR and PLR were not sufficient to establish a diagnosis of HF. NLR can be used to predict mortality during the follow-up of HF patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Durmuş et al. (2015) conducted a case-control in Heart Failure (n=96). Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) vs. Lower NLR was evaluated on Mortality in heart failure patients (OR 1.680, 95% CI 1.013-2.786, p=0.045). Higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio was significantly associated with heart failure and served as an independent predictor of mortality during follow-up (OR 1.680).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7f0b9c0d396ca0cf0fc324https://doi.org/10.5935/abc.20150126
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper