PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 2000Heart409 citationsOpen Access

Normal values of M mode echocardiographic measurements of more than 2000 healthy infants and children in central Europe

CKChristoph Kampmann

Structured PICO

P
Population
2036 healthy infants and children aged one day to 18 years from a single centre in central Europe.
I
Intervention
M-mode echocardiography
O
Outcome
Normal values of M-mode echocardiographic measurements (right ventricular anterior wall thickness, right ventricular end diastolic dimension, thickness of interventricular septum, thickness of posterior wall of the left ventricle, left ventricular dimension, pulmonary and aortic valve diameter, and left atrial dimension)surrogate

Provides comprehensive normal reference values for M-mode echocardiographic measurements in healthy infants and children, facilitating the identification of abnormal cardiac dimensions in pediatric patients.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To obtain normal M mode (one dimensional) echocardiographic values in a substantial sample of normal infants and children. DESIGN: Data were obtained over three years from a single centre in central Europe. PATIENTS: 2036 healthy infants and children aged one day to 18 years. METHODS: In line with recommendations for standardising measurements from M mode echocardiograms, and using digital echocardiographic equipment, measurements were obtained of the following: right ventricular anterior wall thickness at end diastole, right ventricular end diastolic dimension, thickness of interventricular septum at end diastole and end systole, thickness of posterior wall of the left ventricle at end diastole and end systole, left ventricular dimension at end diastole and end systole, pulmonary and aortic valve diameter, and left atrial dimension. RESULTS: Measurements are presented graphically on centile charts with respect to body surface area, and as tables with mean and 2 SD values for newborns in relation to body weight, and for infants and children in relation to body surface area. Best fitting regression equations are given for each measured variable, using the 50th centile values. CONCLUSION: In comparison with previously published normal values, the presented charts and tables make it possible to judge echocardiographic measurements of a particular patient as normal or abnormal.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Christoph Kampmann (2000) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7f4854d6046e930f462cd1https://doi.org/10.1136/heart.83.6.667
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Normal M mode values in healthy Turkish children2014 · 9 citations
  2. 2Reference values for echocardiographic measurements of healthy newborns2011 · 18 citations
  3. 3Age and body surface area related normal upper and lower limits of M mode echocardiographic measurements and left ventricular volume and mass from infancy to early adulthood.1994 · 57 citations
  4. 4Reference Values for Point-of-Care Echocardiographic Measurements of Preterm Infants in China2022 · 5 citations
  5. 5M-mode echocardiographic values in a cohort of young healthy individuals2013