PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 28, 2018ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam)389 citationsOpen Access

High-sensitivity troponin in the evaluation of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome: a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised controlled trial

ASAnoop ShahAAAtul AnandFSFiona E. Strachan

Structured PICO

Does the implementation of a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay with a sex-specific 99th centile threshold reduce subsequent myocardial infarction or cardiovascular death in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome?

P
Population
48,282 consecutive patients admitted to emergency departments with suspected acute coronary syndrome across 10 hospitals in Scotland, mean age 61, 47% women.
I
Intervention
Implementation of a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) assay with a sex-specific 99th centile diagnostic threshold to guide clinical care.
C
Comparator
Standard care guided by a contemporary cardiac troponin I (cTnI) assay, with hs-cTnI results concealed from the attending clinician (validation phase).
O
Outcome
Composite of subsequent myocardial infarction or death from cardiovascular causes at 1 year after initial presentation.composite

The implementation of a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay increased the detection of myocardial injury but did not improve 1-year clinical outcomes in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays permit use of lower thresholds for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction, but whether this improves clinical outcomes is unknown. We aimed to determine whether the introduction of a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) assay with a sex-specific 99th centile diagnostic threshold would reduce subsequent myocardial infarction or cardiovascular death in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. METHODS: In this stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised controlled trial across ten secondary or tertiary care hospitals in Scotland, we evaluated the implementation of an hs-cTnI assay in consecutive patients who had been admitted to the hospitals' emergency departments with suspected acute coronary syndrome. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they presented with suspected acute coronary syndrome and had paired cardiac troponin measurements from the standard care and trial assays. During a validation phase of 6-12 months, results from the hs-cTnI assay were concealed from the attending clinician, and a contemporary cardiac troponin I (cTnI) assay was used to guide care. Hospitals were randomly allocated to early (n=5 hospitals) or late (n=5 hospitals) implementation, in which the high-sensitivity assay and sex-specific 99th centile diagnostic threshold was introduced immediately after the 6-month validation phase or was deferred for a further 6 months. Patients reclassified by the high-sensitivity assay were defined as those with an increased hs-cTnI concentration in whom cTnI concentrations were below the diagnostic threshold on the contemporary assay. The primary outcome was subsequent myocardial infarction or death from cardiovascular causes at 1 year after initial presentation. Outcomes were compared in patients reclassified by the high-sensitivity assay before and after its implementation by use of an adjusted generalised linear mixed model. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01852123. FINDINGS: Between June 10, 2013, and March 3, 2016, we enrolled 48 282 consecutive patients (61 SD 17 years, 47% women) of whom 10 360 (21%) patients had cTnI concentrations greater than those of the 99th centile of the normal range of values, who were identified by the contemporary assay or the high-sensitivity assay. The high-sensitivity assay reclassified 1771 (17%) of 10 360 patients with myocardial injury or infarction who were not identified by the contemporary assay. In those reclassified, subsequent myocardial infarction or cardiovascular death within 1 year occurred in 105 (15%) of 720 patients in the validation phase and 131 (12%) of 1051 patients in the implementation phase (adjusted odds ratio for implementation vs validation phase 1·10, 95% CI 0·75 to 1·61; p=0·620). INTERPRETATION: Use of a high-sensitivity assay prompted reclassification of 1771 (17%) of 10 360 patients with myocardial injury or infarction, but was not associated with a lower subsequent incidence of myocardial infarction or cardiovascular death at 1 year. Our findings question whether the diagnostic threshold for myocardial infarction should be based on the 99th centile derived from a normal reference population. FUNDING: The British Heart Foundation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shah et al. (2018) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7f5e8bdc397acca2f206dchttps://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31923-8
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper