PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 21, 2007Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry19 citations

Long-term occurrence of death and cardiovascular events in patients with transient ischaemic attack or minor ischaemic stroke: comparison between arterial and cardiac source of the index event

View Full Paper
IWIris van WijkPKPeter J. KoudstaalLKL. Jaap Kappelle

Structured PICO

Does the presence of atrial fibrillation compared to arterial origin increase the long-term risk of death and vascular events in patients with transient ischaemic attack or minor ischaemic stroke?

P
Population
2,659 patients with transient ischaemic attack or minor ischaemic stroke, comprising 2,473 patients with cerebral ischaemia of arterial origin (CIAO) from the Dutch TIA Trial and 186 patients with cerebral ischaemia and atrial fibrillation (CIAF) from the European Atrial Fibrillation Trial.
I
Intervention
Cerebral ischaemia and atrial fibrillation (CIAF)
C
Comparator
Cerebral ischaemia of arterial origin (CIAO)
O
Outcome
Death and vascular events (VE)hard clinical

Patients with cerebral ischaemia and atrial fibrillation have a 1.5 times higher long-term risk of death or vascular events compared to those with cerebral ischaemia of arterial origin.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Published data suggest that patients with cerebral ischaemia and atrial fibrillation (CIAF) have higher inhospital mortality than patients with cerebral ischaemia of arterial origin (CIAO). Data on long term risks are scarce. We compared the long term risks of death and vascular events (VE) between these groups. METHODS: We extended the follow-up of 2473 patients from the Dutch TIA Trial (recruitment March 1986 to March 1989, all treated with aspirin; CIAO) and 186 Dutch participants of the European Atrial Fibrillation Trial (recruitment June 1988 to May 1992, 26% on anticoagulants during the trial; CIAF). Hazard ratios (HRs) for death and VE of CIAF versus CIAO were analysed by means of Cox regression analysis and adjusted for age, sex and several cardiovascular risk factors. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 10.1 years, 1484 patients with CIAO had died and 1336 had suffered at least one VE (377 cardiac, 455 stroke). Mean follow-up of the CIAF patients was 6.8 years; 150 patients had died and 136 had suffered at least one VE (41 cardiac, 63 stroke). Adjusted HRs (CIAF vs CIAO) were 1.46 (95% CI 1.22 to 1.74) for death, 1.49 (1.24 to 1.79) for first VE, 1.94 (1.47 to 2.55) for first stroke and 1.41 (1.01 to 1.96) for first cardiac event. These HRs were essentially the same as those for the duration of the trials. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that the long term risk of death or vascular events is 1.5 times higher in patients with CIAF than in those with CIAO, after adjustment for differences between the groups.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wijk et al. (2007) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7f7a53181fd1747d9075eahttps://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2007.133132
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper