PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 15, 2023Chinese Medical Journal8 citationsOpen Access

Intensive blood pressure control on arterial stiffness among older patients with hypertension

‪Z‪Shuyuan ZhangYZYixuan ZhongSWShouling Wu

Structured PICO

Does intensive blood pressure control (SBP 110 to <130 mmHg) reduce the progression of arterial stiffness and risk of CVD in older patients with hypertension?

P
Population
5,339 older patients (aged 60-80 years) with essential hypertension who had twice repeated measurements of arterial stiffness (from an original cohort of 8,511 enrolled patients in China).
I
Intervention
Intensive blood pressure treatment with a systolic blood pressure (SBP) target of 110 mmHg to <130 mmHg.
C
Comparator
Standard blood pressure treatment with an SBP target of 130 mmHg to <150 mmHg.
O
Outcome
Progression of arterial stiffness (change in brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity [baPWV]) and primary CVD outcomes at 3-year follow-up.surrogate

Intensive blood pressure control (SBP <130 mmHg) in older hypertensive patients significantly delays the progression of arterial stiffness and reduces CVD risk compared to standard control.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Arterial stiffening increases with age and blood pressure and is associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD), but the relationship between blood pressure lowering and arterial stiffening is still uncertain, especially in older people. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of intensive blood pressure treatment on the progression of arterial stiffness and risk of CVD in older patients with hypertension. METHODS: The Strategy of Blood Pressure Intervention in the Elderly Hypertensive Patients (STEP) trial was a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial performed at 42 clinical centers throughout China, and 8511 patients aged 60-80 years with essential hypertension were enrolled and randomly assigned to systolic blood pressure (SBP) target of 110 mmHg to <130 mmHg (intensive treatment) or 130 mmHg to <150 mmHg (standard treatment). Patients underwent repeated examinations of the brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) and ankle-brachial index (ABI) at baseline, and the arterial stiffness was evaluated at the 3-year follow-up. A total of 5339 patients who had twice repeated measurements were included in this study. Changes in arterial stiffness between the intensive and standard treatment groups were analyzed using a multivariate linear regression model. The Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to evaluate the effect of intensive treatment on primary CVD outcomes. RESULTS: The changes in baPWV were 61.5 cm/s (95% confidence interval CI: 49.8-73.2 cm/s) in the intensive treatment group and 98.4 cm/s (95% CI: 86.7-110.1 cm/s) in the standard treatment group ( P <0.001). Intensive treatment significantly delayed the progression of arterial stiffness, with an annual change of 23.1 cm·s -1 ·year -1vs. 36.7 cm·s -1 ·year -1 of baPWV in the intensive and standard treatment groups, respectively. During a median follow-up period of 3.36 years, primary CVD outcomes occurred in 77 (2.9%) patients in the intensive treatment group compared with 93 (3.5%) in the standard treatment group. Intensive treatment resulted in a significantly lower CVD risk in patients aged 70-80 years or with SBP <140 mmHg. CONCLUSION: Intensive blood pressure control with an SBP target of 110 mmHg to <130 mmHg could delay the progression of arterial stiffness and reduce the risk of CVD in older patients with hypertension. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; No. NCT03015311.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhang et al. (2023) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7faf66a97e3300ffd76fe1https://doi.org/10.1097/cm9.0000000000002868
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper