PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 19, 2015Psychological Assessment48 citationsOpen Access

Psychometric validation of the Dysexecutive Questionnaire (DEX).

SSSimone ShawTOTian P. S. OeiSSSukanlaya Sawang

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

This study reported on the validation of the psychometric properties, the factorability, validity, and sensitivity of the Dysexecutive Questionnaire (DEX) in 3 clinical and nonclinical samples. A mixed sample of 997 participants--community (n = 663), psychiatric (depressed n = 92 and anxious n = 122), and neurologically impaired (n = 120)--completed self-report questionnaires assessing executive dysfunction, depression, anxiety, stress, general self-efficacy, and satisfaction with life. Before analyses the data were randomly split into 2 subsets (A and B). Exploratory factor analysis performed on Subset A produced a 3-factor model (Factor 1: Inhibition, Factor 2: Volition, and Factor 3: Social Regulation) in which 15 of the original 20 items provided a revised factor structure that was superior to all other structures. A series of confirmatory factor analyses performed on Subset B confirmed that this revised factor structure was valid and reliable. The revised structure, labeled the DEX-R, was found to be a reliable and valid tool for assessing behavioral symptoms of dysexecutive functioning in mixed community, psychiatric, and neurological samples.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shaw et al. (2015) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7fd87d0b725e4993152e53https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038195
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper