PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 1997American Journal of Hypertension12 citationsOpen Access

Discussion

View Full Paper

Structured PICO

What is the optimal biologic zero hour for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring?

P
Population
20 healthy medical students (18 men, 2 women, mean age 26 years old)
I
Intervention
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) every 30 min for 48 h, evaluating four concepts of zero time (clock time, diary time/awakening, activity time, midsleeping time)
O
Outcome
Determination of the biologic zero hour as the zero reference time by evaluating the circadian rhythm of blood pressure, heart rate, and activitysurrogate

Midsleeping time is a better zero reference point than awakening time or mechanical clock time for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, and 48-hour monitoring is superior to 24-hour monitoring.

Abstract

Most ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) studies have used a mechanical clock as the reference time, but there is no biologic background for assuming that midnight by the mechanical clock is zero hour by the biologic clock. The aim of this study was to determine the biologic zero hour as the zero reference time by evaluating the circadian rhythm of blood pressure, heart rate, and activity. Twenty healthy medical students (18 men, 2 women, mean age 26 years old) were recruited and blood pressure, heart rate, and physical activity were monitored simultaneously by an ABPM device every 30 min for 48 h. Four concepts of zero time were selected in this study and analyzed regarding biologic zero hour: 24:00 by the mechanical clock (clock time); the time of awakening, based on a diary (diary time); the time of a sudden increment in physical activity in the morning (activity time); and the middle of the total sleeping time, based on the diary (midsleeping time). The awakening time is a better individual index than the mechanical clock, and the midsleeping time as the zero reference point is better than the awakening time. We assessed the reproducibility of the data regarding the circadian troughs between the first and second day. The reproducibility of the day-to-day variation of the blood pressure and heart rate was poor. The reproducibility of physical activity was fairly good, but the magnitude of activity was small. A 48-h monitoring profile is superior to a 24-h monitoring period.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

A 1997 study studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a8069374fef96f46ad497bdhttps://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-7061(97)00091-5
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Can Simultaneous Ambulatory Blood Pressure and Activity Monitoring Improve the Definition of Blood Pressure?1993 · 40 citations
  2. 2Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring1996 · 13 citations
  3. 3Analysis of twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: what time period to assess blood pressures during waking and sleeping?1995 · 65 citations
  4. 4Improved automatic analysis of ambulatory blood pressure data based on precise detection of individual night-time from diurnal profile of heart rate2002
  5. 5Comparison of the actigraph versus patients’ diary information in defining circadian time periods for analyzing ambulatory blood pressure monitoring data2001 · 48 citations