PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2019Ethics & Medics3 citations

Efficacy of Natural Family Planning Methods

View Full Paper
RFRichard J. Fehring

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

There is a difference between effectiveness and efficacy studies involving family planning methods. Efficacy studies determine whether a method works as expected in specified research conditions; effectiveness studies measure how well a method works in real life. The efficacy of a family planning method is usually determined prospectively by studies conducted in a controlled environment. Effectiveness, on the other hand, is based on the unintended-pregnancy rate among a large population of users over time, usually determined retrospectively through chart reviews or surveys. Most studies of NFP are controlled studies—that is, they are efficacy rather than effectiveness studies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Richard J. Fehring (2019) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a80e38a1c90fa4c6da8a858https://doi.org/10.5840/em2019441217
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Efficacy and Efficiency in Natural Family Planning Services2009 · 10 citations
  2. 2Randomized comparison of two Internet-supported fertility-awareness-based methods of family planning2012 · 67 citations
  3. 3Cohort comparison of two fertility awareness methods of family planning.2009 · 23 citations
  4. 4Further analysis of contraceptive failure of the ovulation method1991 · 69 citations
  5. 5Contraceptive Failure2007 · 2 citations