PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 19, 2012American Journal of Roentgenology108 citations

Characterization of Human Brown Adipose Tissue by Chemical-Shift Water-Fat MRI

PHPeng HuTPThomas G. PerkinsJCJonathan M. Chia

Structured PICO

Can chemical-shift water-fat MRI differentiate brown adipose tissue from white adipose tissue based on fat-signal fractions and T2(*) relaxation times?

P
Population
1 postmortem body and 8 patients (infants, adolescents, and adults)
I
Intervention
Six-echo spoiled gradient-echo chemical-shift water-fat MRI at 3 T
C
Comparator
Subcutaneous white adipose tissue (WAT)
O
Outcome
Fat-signal fractions and T2(*) relaxation timessurrogate

Chemical-shift water-fat MRI can differentiate brown from white adipose tissue using fat-signal fractions and T2(*) relaxation times, serving as complementary biomarkers for BAT detection.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to characterize human brown adipose tissue (BAT) with chemical-shift water-fat MRI and to determine whether trends and differences in fat-signal fractions and T2(*) relaxation times between BAT and white adipose tissue (WAT) are consistently observed postmortem and in vivo in infants, adolescents, and adults. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A postmortem body and eight patients were studied. A six-echo spoiled gradient-echo chemical-shift water-fat MRI sequence was performed at 3 T to jointly quantify fat-signal fraction and T2(*) in interscapular-supraclavicular BAT and subcutaneous WAT. To confirm BAT identity, biopsy and histology served as the reference in the postmortem study and PET/CT was used in five of the eight patients who required examination for medical care. RESULTS: Fat-signal fractions and T2(*) times were lower in BAT than in WAT in the postmortem example and in seven of eight patients. With the exception of one case, nominal comparisons between brown and white adipose tissues were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Between subjects, a large range of fat-signal fraction values was observed in BAT but not in WAT. CONCLUSION: We have shown that fat-signal fractions and T2(*) values jointly derived from chemical-shift water-fat MRI are lower in BAT than in WAT likely because of differences in cellular structures, triglyceride content, and vascularization. The two metrics can serve as complementary biomarkers in the detection of BAT.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hu et al. (2012) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a811e779ec2426b2722dad2https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.12.8996
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper