PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 1999Journal of Hypertension92 citations

Detection of hypertensive patients at risk for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation during sinus rhythm by computer-assisted P wave analysis

View Full Paper
PDPolychronis DilaverisEGElias GialafosDCD CHRISSOS

Structured PICO

Does computer-assisted P-wave analysis during sinus rhythm detect the risk of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in hypertensive patients?

P
Population
110 hypertensive patients, including 50 with a history of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (group A) and 60 without a history of atrial fibrillation (group B).
I
Intervention
Computer-based 12-lead surface electrocardiogram P-wave analysis during sinus rhythm
C
Comparator
Hypertensive patients without a history of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
O
Outcome
Electrocardiographic P-wave parameters (Pmaximum, Pminimum, Pdispersion, APdispersion, mean P, SDP) as predictors of paroxysmal atrial fibrillationsurrogate

Computer-assisted P-wave analysis, specifically minimum P-wave duration, can independently predict the risk of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in hypertensive patients during sinus rhythm.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: To determine whether hypertensive patients at risk for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) could be detected while in sinus rhythm, a computer-based 12-lead surface electrocardiogram was recorded in 50 hypertensive patients with history of paroxysmal AF (group A) and in 60 hypertensive patients without history of AF (group B). The maximum P-wave duration (P(maximum)), the minimum P-wave duration (P(minimum)), P-wave dispersion (Pdispersion = Pmaximum Pminimum), adjusted P-wave dispersion (APdispersion = Pdispersion/square root of the number of measurable leads), mean P-wave duration (mean P) and the standard deviation of the P-wave duration in all measured leads (SDP) were calculated. RESULTS: Pdispersion, APdispersion and SDP were significantly higher in group A than in group B (Pdispersion, 52 +/- 19 versus 41 +/- 15 ms, P< 0.001; APdispersion, 15.2 +/- 5.5 versus 11.9 +/- 4.6 ms, P< 0.001; SDP, 16 +/- 5 versus 13 +/- 5 ms, P < 0.001). P(minimum), mean P and left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) were significantly lower in group A than in group B (Pminimum, 79 +/- 18 versus 91 +/- 13 ms, P < 0.001; mean P, 108 +/- 18 versus 116 +/- 13 ms, P= 0.005; LVEF, 64 +/- 5 versus 69 +/- 8%, P< 0.001). Pminimum, Pdispersion, mean P, SDP, APdispersion and LVEF were found to be significant univariate predictors of paroxysmal AF, whereas only Pminimum (P< 0.001) remained a significant independent predictor of paroxysmal AF in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Hypertensive patients at risk for paroxysmal AF could be detected while in sinus rhythm by computer-assisted electrocardiographic P-wave analysis.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dilaveris et al. (1999) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a8157a5da9cafc35e33a000https://doi.org/10.1097/00004872-199917100-00015
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper