PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 16, 2026Annals of Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Association of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and red blood cell transfusion with venous thrombosis in patients with cancer: a nationwide case-crossover study

View Full Paper
BLByung‐Hyun LeeYYYeonju YuJPJinny Park

Key Points

  • To evaluate and compare the independent risks of incident venous thrombosis associated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and red blood cell transfusions in patients with cancer.
  • Nationwide population-based case-crossover study using the Korean National Health Insurance Database in adult patients with newly diagnosed cancer (2011–2020) who developed incident venous thrombosis.
  • Assessed exposures during a 12-week hazard window preceding thrombosis against a matched 12-week control window separated by a 24-week washout interval using conditional logistic regression.
  • In unadjusted analyses, both ESA therapy (OR, 3.14; 95% CI, 2.63–7.75) and RBC transfusion (OR, 3.83; 95% CI, 3.58–4.11) were linked to higher venous thrombosis risk.
  • After adjusting for time-varying confounders, RBC transfusion remained independently associated with venous thrombosis (adjusted OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.32–1.58), whereas ESA therapy was not significantly associated (adjusted OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.93–1.36).

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cancer-associated anemia is commonly managed with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) and red blood cell (RBC) transfusions; however, their relative thrombotic risks remain uncertain. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide population-based case-crossover study using the Korean National Health Insurance Database. Adult patients with newly diagnosed cancer between 2011 and 2020 who developed incident venous thrombosis were included. Exposure to ESAs and other time-varying risk factors was assessed during a 12-week hazard period preceding thrombosis and compared with a matched 12-week control period, separated by a 24-week washout interval. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs). RESULTS: < .001). In unadjusted analyses, both ESA use (OR, 3.14; 95% CI, 2.63-7.75) and RBC transfusion (OR, 3.83; 95% CI, 3.58-4.11) were associated with an increased risk of venous thrombosis. After adjustment for time-varying confounders, ESA use was not significantly associated with thrombosis (adjusted OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.93-1.36), whereas RBC transfusion remained independently associated with an increased risk (adjusted OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.32-1.58). Sensitivity analyses using 8-week and 4-week exposure windows showed consistent results. CONCLUSIONS: RBC transfusion was associated with an increased risk of venous thrombosis in patients with cancer, whereas ESA therapy was not independently associated with thrombotic complications after adjustment. These findings suggest that RBC transfusion may contribute to thrombotic risk in patients with cancer and highlight the need for careful consideration when managing cancer-associated anaemia.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lee et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a81794cf2fb91fc834ac710https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2026.2716953
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper