PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 22, 2023ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam)12 citationsOpen Access

Win big, buy more: political parties, competition and electoral clientelism

View Full Paper
SGSergiu GherghinaCMClaudiu Marian

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Political parties use electoral clientelism to mobilise their core voters and to persuade swing voters to support them. Earlier research shows that clientelism occurs more often in highly competitive elections. Against these conclusions, this article argues that a large margin of victory can drive the use of electoral clientelism irrespective of the type of constituency. The analysis uses county-level data from the 2020 election campaign in Romania and shows that electoral clientelism is used more in those constituencies with a clear winner. These effects are robust when controlling for socio-economic vulnerability and the percentage of the urban population.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gherghina et al. (2023) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a829695c26e934cd221da0bhttps://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2023.2191951
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1When voter loyalty fails: party performance and corruption in Bulgaria and Romania2011 · 21 citations
  2. 2An Informational Theory of Campaign Clientelism: The Case of Peru2014 · 103 citations
  3. 3Estimating Regression Models in Which the Dependent Variable Is Based on Estimates2005 · 608 citations
  4. 4Electoral volatility in Belgium (2009–2014). Is there a difference between stable and volatile voters?2017 · 22 citations
  5. 5Whither Clientelism? Good Governance and Brazil's Bolsa Família Program2013 · 159 citations