PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 1, 2018Transplantation76 citationsOpen Access

Outcomes of Donation After Circulatory Death Liver Grafts From Donors 50 Years or Older

View Full Paper
KCKristopher P. CroomeAMAmit K. MathurDLDavid D. Lee

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As the population in the United States continues to age, an increase in the number of potential donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors with advanced chronological age can be expected. The aim of this study was to analyze a multi-institutional experience in liver transplantation using DCD donors 50 years or older. METHODS: All DCD liver transplant (LT) performed at Mayo Clinic Florida, Mayo Clinic Rochester, and Mayo Clinic Arizona from 2002 to 2016 were included. Recipients of DCD LT were divided into 2 groups: those with donors 50 years or older (N = 155) and those with donors younger than 50 years(N = 316). RESULTS: Graft survival was similar between the DCD donors 50 years or older group and DCD donors younger than 50 group(P = 0.99). Graft survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 87.0%, 75.6%, and 71.8% in the DCD donors 50 years or older group and 85.8%, 76.0%, and 70.4% in the DCD donors younger than 50 group.The rate of total biliary complications (32.3% vs 23.7%; P = 0.049) and of anastomotic strictures (16.1% vs 8.2%; P = 0.01) were higher in the DCD donors 50 years or older compared with the DCD donors younger than 50 group. No statistical significant difference in the rate of ischemic cholangiopathy (11.6% vs 7.6%; P = 0.15) was seen between the 2 groups. Due to homogeneous practice patterns at the involved institutions, additional Cox regression analysis using national data obtained from Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients was used to evaluate predictors of graft failure in DCD donors 50 years or older. Significant predictors of graft failure included: a calculated Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score of 30 or higher (P < 0.001), mechanical ventilation at the time of transplant (P < 0.001), medical condition (in intensive care unit) (P = 0.002), and cold ischemia time (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates that acceptable graft and patient survival can be achieved with the usage of DCD LT with donors 50 years or older. Optimizing recipient selection criteria and minimizing cold ischemia time may further improve outcomes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Croome et al. (2018) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a82b4b48757ed1e60133ecdhttps://doi.org/10.1097/tp.0000000000002120
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Comparison of longterm outcomes and quality of life in recipients of donation after cardiac death liver grafts with a propensity‐matched cohort2016 · 87 citations
  2. 2Liver allocation and distribution: Possible next steps2011 · 78 citations
  3. 3Risk Factors for Graft Survival After Liver Transplantation from Donation After Cardiac Death Donors: An Analysis of OPTN/UNOS Data2006 · 267 citations
  4. 4Donation After Cardiac Death2005 · 374 citations
  5. 5Events in Procurement as Risk Factors for Ischemic Cholangiopathy in Liver Transplantation Using Donation After Cardiac Death Donors2011 · 160 citations