PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 23, 2014Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine10 citations

Inter‐Rater Reliability of Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaque Quantification by 3‐Dimensional Sonography

View Full Paper
MBMichal BarMRMartin RoubecRFRadim Farana

Structured PICO

P
Population
30 patients (22 male; mean age 72 ± 13 years) with 28 atherosclerotic carotid plaques evaluated.
I
Intervention
Evaluation of sonographic parameters (echogenicity, homogeneity, surface, maximum content, and total volume) using 2D and 3D sonography by 2 independent investigators.
O
Outcome
Inter-rater agreement for sonographic parameters relating to plaque stability (echogenicity, homogeneity, surface, maximum content, and total volume).surrogate

3D sonography demonstrates good to excellent inter-rater reliability for evaluating carotid plaque stability parameters, supporting its potential use for risk assessment.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Embolization from atherosclerotic carotid plaques is the most common cause of ischemic stroke; therefore, identification of high-risk plaques by sonography is important. The aim of this study was to investigate the agreement between 2 investigators in the evaluation of sonographic parameters relating to plaque stability. METHODS: The following plaque parameters were assessed: echogenicity, homogeneity, surface, maximum content, and total volume. Serial 2-dimensional (2D) image sequences were obtained. Linear motion of the probe was automatically synchronized with the electrocardiogram. The edges of the plaque in each image were manually identified by the investigators. The total plaque volume was calculated after computer transformation of 2D images into a 3-dimensinoal (3D) format. Inter-rater reliability for echogenicity, homogeneity, and the surface was assessed by the weighted κ coefficient. Parametric values were tested by a paired t test. RESULTS: We enrolled 30 patients (22 male; mean age ± SD, 72 ± 13 years) in the study and evaluated 28 atherosclerotic plaques. Inter-rater agreement values were as follows: homogeneity, 96% (κ = 0.84; P < .001); surface, 90% (κ = 0.77; P < .001); and echogenicity, 86% (κ = 0.60; P < .001). The significance values for plaque content and volume measurement agreement were P = .311 and .312, respectively, and the correlation coefficient was 0.808. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, the agreement between 2 examiners in the evaluation of 2D and 3D sonographic parameters related to plaque stability was good to excellent. The sonographic measurement of plaque volume growth was the most accurate parameter; therefore, 3D sonography may be used for risk assessment of plaques in the future.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bar et al. (2014) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a82c008aa66c98ddba0cec0https://doi.org/10.7863/ultra.33.7.1273
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Measurement of Carotid Plaque Volume by 3-Dimensional Ultrasound2004 · 211 citations
  2. 2Carotid Plaque, Intima Media Thickness, Cardiovascular Risk Factors, and Prevalent Cardiovascular Disease in Men and Women1999 · 777 citations
  3. 3Interrater reliability of plaque morphology classification in patients with severe carotid artery stenosis2009 · 38 citations
  4. 4Reproducibility of Ultrasound Assessment of Carotid Plaque Occurrence, Thickness, and Morphology1997 · 168 citations
  5. 53D Ultrasound Measurement of Change in Carotid Plaque Volume2005 · 259 citations