PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 10, 1998AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses50 citations

Inhibition of HIV Type 1 BaL Replication by MIP-lα, MIP-1β, and RANTES in Macrophages

View Full Paper
MCMaria Rosaria CapobianchiIAIsabella AbbateGAGuido Antonelli

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The beta-chemokines RANTES, MIP-1alpha, and MIP-1beta have been shown to inhibit the infection of T cells by macrophage-tropic HIV-1 strains by blocking env-driven HIV-1 fusion through competition for the chemokine receptors or receptor downregulation. This study was aimed at testing whether beta-chemokines also inhibit the productive infection of monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs) by a monocytotropic HIV-1 strain, by using virus yield assays. The action of the beta-chemokines MIP-1alpha, MIP-1beta, and RANTES was captured with that of the alpha-chemokine interleukin 8 (IL-8) and of interferon alpha (IFN-alpha), which is a well-known broad-range inhibitor of viral replication. While IL-8 did not inhibit HIV-1 BaL replication in MDMs, the beta-chemokines were dose-dependently inhibitory. RANTES was the most effective, reaching at 300 ng/ml a protection similar to that obtained with IFN-alpha at 1000 IU/ml, and was even more inhibitory when added to MDMs after virus attachment. In contrast to IFN-alpha, the antiviral activity of beta-chemokines was restricted to HIV, because another virus was not inhibited. As compared with untreated MDMs, full-length proviral DNA at day 1 postinfection was inhibited in MDMs treated with RANTES either before or after the absorption phase, and even more so in IFN-treated MDMs, whereas in IL-8-treated MDMs no inhibition was observed. Our results indicate that in MDMs both RANTES and IFN affect early steps of HIV-1 BaL replication, preceding the completion of viral DNA synthesis.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Capobianchi et al. (1998) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a82d4088aa2f088808d6879https://doi.org/10.1089/aid.1998.14.233
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Chemokine receptors: Gateways to inflammation and infection1996 · 646 citations
  2. 2Determinants of HIV-1 Coreceptor Function on CC Chemokine Receptor 31997 · 72 citations
  3. 3Potent Inhibition of HIV-1 Infectivity in Macrophages and Lymphocytes by a Novel CCR5 Antagonist1997 · 614 citations
  4. 4Replication of human immunodeficiency virus in monocytes. Granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) potentiates viral production yet enhances the antiviral effect mediated by 3'-azido-2'3'-dideoxythymidine (AZT) and other dideoxynucleoside congeners of thymidine.1989 · 290 citations
  5. 5The Inhibition of HIV Replication in Monocytes by Interleukin 10 Is Linked to Inhibition of Cell Differentiation1996 · 29 citations