PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 1993AJP Regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology136 citations

Evidence for endothelin-induced renal vasoconstriction independent of ETA receptor activation

View Full Paper
DPDavid M. PollockTOTerry J. Opgenorth

Structured PICO

Does ETA receptor blockade with BQ-123 prevent ET-1-induced renal vasoconstriction in anesthetized Sprague-Dawley rats?

P
Population
Anesthetized Sprague-Dawley rats
I
Intervention
Intravenous infusion of ET-1 (25 pmol.kg-1 x min-1) with or without specific ETA receptor antagonist BQ-123 (0.1 mg.kg-1 x min-1) for 60 minutes
C
Comparator
Control period (baseline) and ET-1 infusion alone
O
Outcome
Changes in mean arterial pressure, renal plasma flow, glomerular filtration rate, and renal vascular resistancesurrogate

ETA receptor blockade prevents ET-1-induced systemic hypertension but does not prevent ET-1-induced renal vasoconstriction, suggesting renal effects are mediated independently of ETA receptors.

Abstract

Experiments were designed to examine the role of endothelin (ET) receptors, specifically ETA receptors, in mediating the renal vasoconstrictor effects of ET-1 in anesthetized Sprague-Dawley rats. Intravenous infusion of ET-1 at 25 pmol.kg-1 x min-1 for 60 min produced a significant increase in mean arterial pressure (20 +/- 7%) and decreases in renal plasma flow (-60 +/- 6%) and glomerular filtration rate (-47 +/- 6%). Renal vascular resistance was significantly increased from 17 +/- 1 mmHg.ml-1 x min.g kidney wt during control period to 54 +/- 11 mmHg.ml-1 x min.g kidney wt during the experimental period. A second group of rats was infused with both ET-1 and the specific ETA receptor antagonist BQ-123 (0.1 mg.kg-1 x min-1). ET-1-induced increases in mean arterial pressure were completely blocked by BQ-123 (the average change was -7 +/- 4%). However, the renal vasoconstrictor effects of ET-1 were not affected by the antagonist, since renal plasma flow and glomerular filtration rate were again significantly reduced (-54 +/- 4 and -56 +/- 6%, respectively). Once again, renal vascular resistance was significantly increased from 16 +/- 2 mmHg.ml-1 x min.g kidney wt during the control period to 33 +/- 5 mmHg.ml-1 x min.g kidney wt during the experimental period. In a third group, infusion of BQ-123 alone produced a significant decline in mean arterial pressure (-13 +/- 2%), with no significant changes in renal plasma flow or glomerular filtration rate, thus producing a significant decrease in renal vascular resistance (15 +/- 1 vs. 11 +/- 2 mmHg.ml-1 x min.g kidney wt).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pollock et al. (1993) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a83096328b8a62be998fea0https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.1993.264.1.r222
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1ETAreceptor‐mediated responses to endothelin‐1 and big endothelin‐1 in the rat kidney1994 · 62 citations
  2. 2Localization of endothelin ETA and ETB receptor‐mediated constriction in the renal microcirculation of rats.1996 · 58 citations
  3. 3Vasoconstriction in the Rat Kidney Induced by Endothelin-1 Is Blocked by PD 1450651993 · 21 citations
  4. 4DIFFERENTIAL BLOCKADE OF THE RENAL VASOCONSTRICTOR AND DIURETIC RESPONSES TO ENDOTHELIN‐1 BY ENDOTHELIN ANTAGONIST1994 · 22 citations
  5. 5Roles of endothelin receptors in the regional and systemic vascular responses to ET‐1 in the anaesthetized ganglion‐blocked rat: use of selective antagonists1995 · 37 citations