PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 1980Circulation72 citations

Symptom-limited vs heart-rate-limited exercise testing soon after myocardial infarction.

View Full Paper
Robert F. DeBusk
Robert F. DeBuskGeneral / Preventive / Lipids
William L. Haskell
William L. HaskellBoston University

Structured PICO

Does symptom-limited exercise testing compared to heart-rate-limited exercise testing improve the detection of ischemic ST-segment depression and ventricular ectopic activity in men soon after uncomplicated myocardial infarction?

P
Population
200 men 3 weeks after uncomplicated myocardial infarction
I
Intervention
Symptom-limited (SXL) exercise testing protocol
C
Comparator
Heart-rate-limited (HRL) exercise testing protocol (effort terminated at heart rate of 130 beats/min in the absence of limiting symptoms, exertional hypotension, or ventricular tachycardia)
O
Outcome
Prevalence of exercise-induced ischemic ST-segment depression and ventricular ectopic activitysurrogate

Symptom-limited and heart-rate-limited exercise testing protocols are equally effective and safe for detecting ischemia and ventricular ectopy 3 weeks after uncomplicated myocardial infarction.

Abstract

To develop guidelines for exercise testing soon after uncomplicated myocardial infarction, 93 men completed a heart-rate-limited (HRL) protocol and 107 completed a symptom-limited (SXL) protocol 3 weeks after the acute event. In the HRL protocol, effort terminated at a heart rate of 130 beats/min in the absence of a limiting symptom, exertional hypotension or ventricular tachycardia. Peak heart rate was not an end point in the SXL protocol. Despite a higher peak heart rate and work load in patients who completed the SXL protocol, the prevalence of exercise-induced ischemic ST-segment depression and ventricular ectopic activity was similar in the two groups. No complications occurred with either protocol. Twelve patients (6%) had cardiac events within the next 2 months. Regardless of the test protocol used, early events were more common in patients with ischemic ST-segment responses (15%) than in patients without ischemic responses (3%) (p less than 0.01). In contrast, exercise-induced ventricular arrhythmias were not predictive of early events. Eleven weeks after infarction, when all tests were SXL, the prevalence of exercise-induced ischemic ST-segment depression and premature ventricular complexes was similar to that at 3 weeks. We conclude that SXL and HRL exercise test protocols reveal a similar prevalence of ischemic ST-segment depression and ventricular ectopic activity soon after uncomplicated myocardial infarction.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

DeBusk et al. (1980) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a830c35c009eb9b7eefe0f1https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.61.4.738
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Exercise Testing Soon After Uncomplicated Myocardial Infarction1981 · 13 citations
  2. 2Prognostic value of a single exercise test 3 weeks after uncomplicated myocardial infarction.1980 · 173 citations
  3. 3Limited Exercise Testing Soon After Myocardial Infarction1981 · 100 citations
  4. 4Submaximal exercise testing early after myocardial infarction. Prognostic importance of exercise induced ST segment elevation.1984 · 33 citations
  5. 5Exercise testing soon after myocardial infarction.1977 · 162 citations