PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 16, 2000New England Journal of Medicine429 citationsOpen Access

Meta-Analyses of the Relation between Silicone Breast Implants and the Risk of Connective-Tissue Diseases

View Full Paper
EJEsther C. JanowskyLKLawrence L. KupperBHBarbara S. Hulka

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The postulated relation between silicone breast implants and the risk of connective-tissue and autoimmune diseases has generated intense medical and legal interest during the past decade. The salience of the issue persists, despite the fact that a great deal of research has been conducted on this subject. To provide a stronger quantitative basis for addressing the postulated relation, we applied several techniques of meta-analysis that combine, compare, and summarize the results of existing relevant studies. METHODS: We searched data bases and reviewed citations in relevant articles to identify studies that met prestated inclusion criteria. Nine cohort studies, nine case-control studies, and two cross-sectional studies were included in our meta-analyses. We conducted meta-analyses of the results of these studies, both with and without adjustment for confounding factors, and a separate analysis restricted to studies of silicone-gel-filled breast implants. Finally, we estimated the annual number of new cases of connective-tissue disease that could be attributed to breast implants. RESULTS: There was no evidence that breast implants were associated with a significant increase in the summary adjusted relative risk of individual connective-tissue diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, 1.04 95 percent confidence interval, 0.72 to 1.51; systemic lupus erythematosus, 0.65 95 percent confidence interval, 0.35 to 1.23; scleroderma or systemic sclerosis, 1.01 95 percent confidence interval, 0.59 to 1.73; and Sjögren's syndrome, 1.42 95 percent confidence interval, 0.65 to 3.11); all definite connective-tissue diseases combined (0.80; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.62 to 1.04); or other autoimmune or rheumatic conditions (0.96; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.74 to 1.25). Nor was there evidence of significantly increased risk in the unadjusted analyses or in the analysis restricted to silicone-gel-filled implants. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of our meta-analyses, there was no evidence of an association between breast implants in general, or silicone-gel-filled breast implants specifically, and any of the individual connective-tissue diseases, all definite connective-tissue diseases combined, or other autoimmune or rheumatic conditions. From a public health perspective, breast implants appear to have a minimal effect on the number of women in whom connective-tissue diseases develop, and the elimination of implants would not be likely to reduce the incidence of connective-tissue diseases.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Janowsky et al. (2000) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a83519d23a6192d2acaa010https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm200003163421105
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper