PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 1997AJP Heart and Circulatory Physiology138 citations

Baroreflex control of sinus node during dynamic exercise in humans: effects of central command and muscle reflexes

View Full Paper
FIFerdinando IellamoJLJacopo M. LegramanteGRGianfranco Raimondi

Structured PICO

Does voluntary and electrically induced knee extension alter arterial baroreflex control of the sinus node in healthy men?

P
Population
22 healthy men
I
Intervention
Voluntary knee extension and electrically induced dynamic knee extension under free-flow and arrested-flow (n = 18) conditions
C
Comparator
Rest
O
Outcome
Arterial baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) evaluated by analyzing the slopes of sequences of three or more consecutive beats characterized by systolic arterial pressure and pulse intervalsurrogate

Central command and muscle chemoreflexes act to preserve baroreflex sensitivity during dynamic exercise, overriding mechanoreceptor-mediated decreases.

Abstract

This study evaluated the influence of central command and muscle afferent stimulation (mechanical and chemical) on the integrated arterial baroreflex control of the sinus node during dynamic exercise. Twenty-two healthy men performed voluntary knee extension and electrically induced dynamic knee extension under free-flow and arrested-flow (n = 18) conditions. Systolic arterial pressure (SAP) and pulse interval (PI) were measured continuously and noninvasively. The arterial baroreflex was evaluated by analyzing the slopes of sequences of three or more consecutive beats characterized by the SAP and PI of the following beat; both increased or decreased in a linear fashion. Compared with rest, both voluntary exercise and electrically induced exercise under arrested-flow conditions resulted in a maintained baroreflex sensitivity (BRS; 11.7 +/- 1.2 vs. 9.6 +/- 0.7 and 11.3 +/- 1.4 vs. 9.8 +/- 1.5 ms/mmHg, respectively; not significant), with an apparent rightward shift in the regression line relating SAP to PI. Electrically induced exercise under free-flow conditions resulted in a significant decrease in BRS (12.1 +/- 1.4 vs. 8.8 +/- 0.8 ms/mmHg; P < 0.05). These data suggest that the central command and muscle chemoreflex act to preserve the BRS, possibly "resetting" the baroreceptor-cardiac response relationship, whereas stimulation of mechanosensitive receptors appears capable of modifying the integrated baroreflex control of sinus node function in humans. The first two mechanisms seem, however, to overwhelm the latter to maintain BRS, thus permitting a concomitant increase in arterial pressure and heart rate.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Iellamo et al. (1997) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a83679adb309ebd40a33f5chttps://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.1997.272.3.h1157
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Baroreflex control of sinus node during dynamic exercise in humans: effect of muscle mechanoreflex2007 · 19 citations
  2. 2Interaction of cardiac and muscle mechanical afferents on baroreflex control of the sinus node during dynamic exercise2010 · 6 citations
  3. 3Evaluation of spontaneous baroreflex modulation of sinus node during isometric exercise in healthy humans1994 · 60 citations
  4. 4Arterial baroreflex buffering of sympathetic activation during exercise-induced elevations in arterial pressure.1990 · 125 citations
  5. 5Carotid baroreflex control of blood pressure and heart rate in men during dynamic exercise1994 · 148 citations