PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 26, 2011Physiological Measurement24 citationsOpen Access

A novel photoplethysmography technique to derive normalized arterial stiffness as a blood pressure independent measure in the finger vascular bed

GTGohichi TanakaKYKen-ichi YamakoshiYSYukihiro Sawada

Structured PICO

Can a novel photoplethysmography technique accurately derive normalized arterial stiffness in the finger vascular bed?

P
Population
Healthy young participants (study 1: n=19; study 2: n=174; study 3: n=6) and arteriosclerotic patients (n=7)
I
Intervention
Finger arterial elasticity index (FEI) and normalized finger arterial stiffness index (FSI) derived from photoplethysmography
O
Outcome
Validity and reproducibility of FEI and FSI as measures of small arterial stiffnesssurrogate

A novel photoplethysmography-derived finger arterial stiffness index provides a simple, reproducible, and blood pressure-independent measure of small artery stiffness.

Abstract

Stiffening of the small artery may be the earliest sign of arteriosclerosis. However, there is no adequate method for directly assessing small arterial stiffness. In this study, the finger arterial elasticity index (FEI) was defined as the parameter n which denotes the curvilinearity of an exponential model of pressure (P)-volume (V(a)) relationship (V(a) = a - b exp (-nP)). For the original estimation, the FEI was calculated from a compliance index from the finger photoplethysmogram whilst occluding the finger. A simple estimation of the FEI was devised by utilizing normalized pulse volume instead of the compliance index. Both estimations yielded close agreement with the exponential model in healthy young participants (study 1: n = 19). Since the FEI was dependent on finger mean blood pressure, normalized finger arterial stiffness index (FSI) was defined as standardized residual from their relationship: mean and standard deviation (SD) of the FSI were 50 ± 10 (study 2: n = 174). The mean coefficient of variation of the FSI for four measurements was 5.72% (study 3: n = 6). The mean and SD of the FSI in seven arteriosclerotic patients were 100.0 ± 13.5. In conclusion, the FEI and FSI by simple estimation are valid and useful for arteriosclerosis research.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tanaka et al. (2011) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a83fa7e6dd47ec7468dd056https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/32/11/003
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper