PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 15, 1994Cytometry101 citations

Evaluation of flow cytometric methods for diagnosis of chronic granulomatous disease variants under routine laboratory conditions

View Full Paper
AEAndreas EmmendörfferMNMichio NakamuraGRG. Rothe

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Neutrophils from 50 pediatric patients with normal phagocyte functions, from 150 healthy adults, from 10 chronic granulomatous disease (CGD)-patients (4 CGD+), and from 18 X-linked carriers for CGD have been tested for their production of H2O2 using staining with dihydrorhodamine 123 and subsequent flow cytometry. Additionally, neutrophils from three patients with myeloperoxidase deficiency were assessed. Cells were activated to produce H2O2 by the phorbol ester phorbol-myristate-acetate (PMA) and by phagocytosis of Escherichia coli bacteria. To evaluate the sensitivity of the method, H2O2-production by neutrophils which was inhibited by different concentrations of diphenyljodonium (DPI) was measured. The results were compared to those from other methods (NBT-testing, cytochrome c-reduction, and especially chemiluminescence). Normal values and ranges of scatter profile were evaluated in terms of peak channel fluorescence: 97% > 700, x = 840 +/- 59 (S.D.), 97% 485, 97% < 680, peak channel fluorescence. We conclude that flow cytometric routine diagnostics of CGD can easily enhance the reliability of recognition and the yield of information about this disease compared to conventional methods.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Emmendörffer et al. (1994) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a8405d8c2c8a33f31f79238https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.990180306
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper