PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 1997Journal of Biological Chemistry501 citationsOpen Access

Differential Phosphorylation of the Retinoblastoma Protein by G1/S Cyclin-dependent Kinases

View Full Paper
TZTamara ZarkowskaSMSibylle Mittnacht

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein, pRB, is inactivated by phosphorylation. While existing evidence is strong that such phosphorylation is mediated by one or more cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) active during G1/S, it remains unclear which of the various CDKs is responsible. We show here that three candidate pRB-inactivating kinases, CDK4-cyclin D1, CDK2-cyclin E, and CDK2-cyclin A, phosphorylate pRB differentially, each on a subset of authentic pRB phosphorylation sites. Notably, two neighboring pRB phosphate acceptors, threonine 821 and threonine 826, which have previously been implicated in the regulation of LXCXE protein binding, are phosphorylated by different CDKs. We demonstrate that phosphorylation by either CDK2-cyclin A, which phosphorylates T821, or CDK4-cyclin D1, which phosphorylates threonine 826, can disable pRB for subsequent binding of an LXCXE protein. However, only one of these two kinases, CDK2-cyclin A, can dissociate a pre-existing LXCXE protein-pRB complex. We provide evidence that prior binding of an LXCXE protein blocks access to certain residues specifically targeted by CDK4-cyclin D1, explaining the inability of this kinase to resolve such complexes. While these results are not direct proof of the relevance of differential pRB phosphorylation in cells, our findings support a model whereby full phosphorylation of pRB may require the action of more than one kinase and explains how such differential phosphorylation by different CDKs might translate into a differential regulation of downstream effector pathways.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zarkowska et al. (1997) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a843460165e087ca0f2f677https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.272.19.12738
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1An N-Terminal transformation-governing sequence of SV40 large T antigen contributes to the binding of both p110 and a second cellular protein, p1201989 · 236 citations
  2. 2Adenovirus type 12 E1A protein expressed in Escherichia coli is functional upon transfer by microinjection or protoplast fusion into mammalian cells1986 · 8 citations
  3. 3Monoclonal antibodies specific for underphosphorylated retinoblastoma protein identify a cell cycle regulated phosphorylation site targeted by CDKs1997 · 60 citations
  4. 4Differential Regulation of Retinoblastoma Protein Function by Specific Cdk Phosphorylation Sites1996 · 325 citations
  5. 5Distinct sub‐populations of the retinoblastoma protein show a distinct pattern of phosphorylation.1994 · 151 citations