PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 2000RNA71 citationsOpen Access

Ribosomal binding to the internal ribosomal entry site of classical swine fever virus

VKVictoria KolupaevaTPTatyana V. PestovaCHChristopher U.T. Hellen

Structured PICO

P
Population
Classical swine fever virus (CSFV) internal ribosome entry site (IRES) and ribosomal 40S subunits
I
Intervention
Enzymatic footprinting and mutagenesis of the IRES
O
Outcome
Identification of structural components responsible for precise binding of the ribosome

The study identifies key structural components of the CSFV IRES, including the pseudoknot and domain IIIa, that are essential for direct binding of the ribosomal 40S subunit and internal initiation of translation.

Abstract

Most eukaryotic mRNAs require the cap-binding complex elF4F for efficient initiation of translation, which occurs as a result of ribosomal scanning from the capped 5' end of the mRNA to the initiation codon. A few cellular and viral mRNAs are translated by a cap and end-independent mechanism known as internal ribosomal entry. The internal ribosome entry site (IRES) of classical swine fever virus (CSFV) is approximately 330 nt long, highly structured, and mediates internal initiation of translation with no requirement for elF4F by recruiting a ribosomal 43S preinitiation complex directly to the initiation codon. The key interaction in this process is the direct binding of ribosomal 40S subunits to the IRES to form a stable binary complex in which the initiation codon is positioned precisely in the ribosomal P site. Here, we report the results of analyses done using enzymatic footprinting and mutagenesis of the IRES to identify structural components in it responsible for precise binding of the ribosome. Residues flanking the initiation codon and extending from nt 363-391, a distance equivalent to the length of the 40S subunit mRNA-binding cleft, were strongly protected from RNase cleavage, as were nucleotides in the adjacent pseudoknot and in the more distal subdomain IIId1. Ribosomal binding and IRES-mediated initiation were abrogated by disruption of helix 1b of the pseudoknot and very severely reduced by mutation of the protected residues in IIId1 and by disruption of domain IIIa. These observations are consistent with a model for IRES function in which binding of the region flanking the initiation codon to the decoding region of the ribosome is determined by multiple additional interactions between the 40S subunit and the IRES.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kolupaeva et al. (2000) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a844063c0e58a00207bf45chttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1355838200000662
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Stability of a stem-loop involving the initiator AUG controls the efficiency of internal initiation of translation on hepatitis C virus RNA.2020 · 252 citations
  2. 2Specific Interaction of Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor 3 with the 5′ Nontranslated Regions of Hepatitis C Virus and Classical Swine Fever Virus RNAs1998 · 289 citations
  3. 3A prokaryotic-like mode of cytoplasmic eukaryotic ribosome binding to the initiation codon during internal translation initation of hepatitis C and classical swine fever virus RNAs1998 · 728 citations
  4. 4Internal entry of ribosomes is directed by the 5' noncoding region of classical swine fever virus and is dependent on the presence of an RNA pseudoknot upstream of the initiation codon1997 · 150 citations
  5. 5Mutational analysis of a conserved tetraloop in the 5′ untranslated region of hepatitis C virus identifies a novel RNA element essential for the internal ribosome entry site function1999 · 50 citations