PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2017Russian Journal of Cardiology8 citationsOpen Access

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Differential Diagnostics of Acute Coronary Syndrome in Patients With Non-Obstruction Coronary Atherosclerosis

VRV. V. RyabovSGS. B. GomboevaТШТ. А. Шелковникова

Key Result

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute coronary syndrome and non-obstructive coronary atherosclerosis significantly changed the diagnostic structure, increasing the identification of myocarditis by 20% with a diagnostic accuracy of 78%.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=44)

Blinding

Open-label

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does cardiac magnetic resonance imaging improve the differential diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome in patients with non-obstructive coronary atherosclerosis?

P
Population
44 adult patients (mean age 54 years, 32% female) with acute coronary syndrome and non-obstructive coronary atherosclerosis who underwent cardiac MRI for differential diagnosis.
I
Intervention
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with contrast (Gadovist) performed 11±8 days (range 2-43 days) from ACS onset.
C
Comparator
Clinical and instrumental diagnosis prior to cardiac MRI.
O
Outcome
In-hospital mortality, acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina, Takotsubo syndrome, and myocarditis.surrogate

Cardiac MRI with contrast provides high diagnostic accuracy (78%) and significantly alters the clinical diagnosis in patients with MINOCA, particularly by increasing the detection of myocarditis.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 23% vs 2%

p-value: p=<0.05

Limitations

  • Small sample size
  • Single-center study
  • Non-randomized design
  • Delayed timing of MRI performance (average 11±8 days from symptom onset)

Abstract

Aim. To investigate on the nosological structure of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in patients with non-obstruction coronary atherosclerosis (NOCA) before and after magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the heart. Material and methods . A non-randomized, open, controlled study (NCT02655718). The patients included, with ACS, older than 18 y.o., with NOCA (intact coronary arteries or stenosis ≤50%) confirmed by invasive coronary arteriography (ICAG). Patients with previous revascularization were not included. Results. In the year 2016, to emergency cardiology department (ECD) 913 ACS patients admitted. In 44 (4,8%) the NOCA was found. Mean age 54±10,4 y.o., males 68%, and the groups with ACS with ST elevation (STEACS) and none (NSTEANS) were comparable by clinical and anamnestic parameters. Intact coronary arteries were visualized in 16 (53%), non-significant coronary atherosclerosis was diagnosed in 14 (32%), slower coronary flow — 22 (73%). By MRI with contrast, performed in 11±8 days (2-43 days) from ACS beginning, myocardial oedema was found in 18 (41%), hyperemia in 13 (30%) and fibrosis in 40 (91%); there were no changes in 1 patient. Nosological structure of ACS in NOCA after MRI has been represented: by acute myocardial infarction (MI) in 24 (55%) cases, unstable angina (UA) — in 6 (14%), pseudocoronary myocarditis in 10 (23%), acute aorta dissection in 1 (2%), posttraumatic atherosclerosis in 1 (2%), congenital valve defect in 1 (2%), manifested Wolf-Parkinson-White (WPW) — in 1 (2%). In-hospital mortality was 2%. In comparison of ACS before and post MRI there was significant increase number of patients with myocarditis, by 20%. Conclusion. The prevalence of ACS in NOCA is 4,8%, that is comparable to literature data. Patients with ACS and NOCA are heterogenic group with MI, UA, myocarditis, acute aorta dissection, posttraumatic atherosclerosis, congenital defects, WPW syndrome. In-hospital mortality was 2%. Comparing the structure of the diagnoses before and after MRI, there was significant increase of myocarditis patients number. A high accuracy of MRI was found for differential diagnostics of ACS in NOCA, which was 78%.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ryabov et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Acute coronary syndrome with non-obstructive coronary atherosclerosis (n=44). Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with contrast vs. Standard clinical and instrumental evaluation (pre-MRI diagnosis) was evaluated on Diagnosis of myocarditis (p=<0.05). Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute coronary syndrome and non-obstructive coronary atherosclerosis significantly changed the diagnostic structure, increasing the identification of myocarditis by 20% with a diagnostic accuracy of 78%.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a84651d25efb1e71e83f4b7https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2017-12-47-54
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Before Invasive Coronary Angiography in Suspected Non–ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction2024 · 8 citations
  2. 2Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries2021 · 1 citations
  3. 3Yield of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease2017 · 1 citations
  4. 4MRI findings in patients with acute coronary syndrome and unobstructed coronary arteries2018 · 6 citations
  5. 5With a single ‘wave of the wand’: cardiovascular magnetic resonance transforms the diagnostics of acute coronary syndrome2023