PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 7, 2013Circulation Cardiovascular Imaging108 citationsOpen Access

Longitudinal Determinants of Left Ventricular Mass and Geometry

SGSamuel S. GiddingKLKiang LiuLCLaura A. Colangelo

Structured PICO

P
Population
2,426 black and white men and women (54.7% white) aged 43 to 55 years from the CARDIA study with cardiovascular risk factor data and echocardiograms from year 5 and 25 examinations.
O
Outcome
20-year change in left ventricular (LV) mass (LVM) and LV geometry (relative wall thickness)surrogate

Cardiovascular risk traits in young adulthood and their changes over time are significant predictors of adverse changes in left ventricular mass and geometry by middle age.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to identify determinants of 20-year change in left ventricular (LV) mass (LVM) and LV geometry in black and white young adults in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 2426 black and white men and women (54.7% white) aged 43 to 55 years with cardiovascular risk factor data and echocardiograms from CARDIA year 5 and 25 examinations. In regression models, year 25 LVM or relative wall thickness was the dependent variable and with year 5 echo values, age, sex, race, body mass index, change in body mass index, mean arterial blood pressure, change in mean blood pressure, heart rate, change in heart rate, tobacco use, presence of diabetes mellitus, alcohol use, and physical activity score as independent variables. LVM and relative wall thickness increased, whereas prevalence of normal geometry declined from 84.2% to 69.7%. Significant determinants of year 25 LVM/m(2.7) were year 5 LVM, year 5 and change in body mass index, year 5 and change in mean arterial pressure, year 5 and change in heart rate, baseline diabetes mellitus, and year 5 tobacco and alcohol use (overall r(2)=0.40). Significant determinants of year 25 relative LV wall thickness were year 5 value, black race, change in body mass index, year 5 and change in mean arterial pressure, starting smoking, and year 5 diabetes mellitus (overall r(2)=0.11). CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of abnormal LV hypertrophy and geometry increased from young adulthood to middle age. Both young adult cardiovascular risk traits and change in these traits predicted change in LV mass/geometry.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gidding et al. (2013) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a85485a22ea7ab258b2f175https://doi.org/10.1161/circimaging.112.000450
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Relationship of Cardiovascular Risk Factors to Echocardiographic Left Ventricular Mass in Healthy Young Black and White Adult Men and Women1995 · 305 citations
  2. 2Correlates of left ventricular mass and geometry in elderly males with established cardiovascular disease: An observational study2026
  3. 3Physiological determinants of the variation in left ventricular mass from early adolescence to late adulthood in healthy subjects2005 · 33 citations
  4. 4Physiological determinants of the variation in left ventricular mass from early adolescence to late adulthood in healthy subjects2007 · 18 citations
  5. 5Childhood Adiposity as a Predictor of Cardiac Mass in Adulthood2004 · 221 citations