PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 15, 2016Critical Care64 citationsOpen Access

Prognostic impact of restored sinus rhythm in patients with sepsis and new-onset atrial fibrillation

WLWen Cheng LiuWLWen Yu LinCLChin‐Sheng Lin

Structured PICO

Does restoration of sinus rhythm improve in-hospital mortality in patients with sepsis and new-onset atrial fibrillation?

P
Population
503 patients with sepsis admitted to a medical intensive care unit, excluding those with pre-existing atrial fibrillation.
I
Intervention
Restoration of sinus rhythm in patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation (NeOAF to SR).
C
Comparator
Failure to restore sinus rhythm (NeOAF to AF) and no new-onset atrial fibrillation (no NeOAF).
O
Outcome
In-hospital mortalityhard clinical

Failure to restore sinus rhythm in septic patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation is associated with significantly increased in-hospital mortality.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: New-onset atrial fibrillation (NeOAF) is a common type of tachyarrhythmia in critically ill patients and is associated with increased mortality in patients with sepsis. However, the prognostic impact of restored sinus rhythm (SR) in septic patients with NeOAF remains unclear. METHODS: A total of 791 patients with sepsis, who were admitted to a medical intensive care unit from January 2011 to January 2014, were screened. NeOAF was detected by continuous electrocardiographic monitoring. Patients were categorized into three groups: no NeOAF, NeOAF with restored SR (NeOAF to SR), and NeOAF with failure to restore SR (NeOAF to atrial fibrillation (AF)). The endpoint of this study was in-hospital mortality. Patients with pre-existing AF were excluded. RESULTS: We reviewed the data of 503 eligible patients, including 263 patients with no NeOAF and 240 patients with NeOAF. Of these 240 patients, SR was restored in 165 patients, and SR could not be restored in 75 patients. The NeOAF to AF group had the highest in-hospital mortality rate of 61.3% compared with the NeOAF to SR and no NeOAF groups (26.1% and 17.5%, respectively). Moreover, multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that failure of restored SR was independently associated with increased in-hospital mortality in patients with sepsis and NeOAF. CONCLUSIONS: Failure to restore a sinus rhythm in patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation may be associated with increased in-hospital mortality in patients with sepsis. Further prospective studies are needed to clarify the effects of restoration of sinus rhythm on survival in patients with sepsis and new-onset atrial fibrillation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liu et al. (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a8548ad563dbb7b86d984e6https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1548-2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Cardiac arrhythmias in critically ill patients1990 · 139 citations
  2. 2Mechanisms of sepsis-induced cardiac dysfunction2007 · 604 citations
  3. 3Inflammation as a Risk Factor for Atrial Fibrillation2003 · 1,438 citations
  4. 4New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation Is an Independent Predictor of Mortality in Medical Intensive Care Unit Patients2015 · 66 citations
  5. 5Incidence and Prognosis of Sustained Arrhythmias in Critically Ill Patients2008 · 217 citations